2
whacko_jacko 2 points ago +2 / -0

I heard it across several FM stations around 1:15 P.M. Central time.

1
whacko_jacko 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point I think it is worth mentioning that John Durham was appointed as Interim US Attorney on October 28, 2017. What a coincidence!

1
whacko_jacko 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point I think it is worth mentioning that John Durham was appointed as Interim US Attorney on October 28, 2017. What a coincidence!

2
whacko_jacko 2 points ago +2 / -0

On what date did Sessions make this appointment?

That's a hell of a coincidence.

1
whacko_jacko 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had a similar thought a few days ago:

https://thedonald.win/p/11RhKGwcNQ/x/c/4DtDoKBPV9Y

The SoS twist is another I had considered but I wasn't sure what to think of Grassley. Does Q ever mention him?

VP confirmation is a tricky issue. I really think they intend to wait until late 2022 for the Trump as VP move to give people time to accept what has happened. If 46/47 (see my comments in the link above about an interim VP) resigns on Jan 21, 2023, then Trump's second term as president is less than 2 years, making him eligible to run again in 2024. What you said is not really correct, he cannot serve 8 more years without a constitutional amendment. But he can serve 6, plus up to 2 as VP, depending on how quickly the confirmation can be politically viable. I see what you mean about the acting President thing not really being elected in the case that no one is elected, I just have some doubt that it would be interpreted like that or that the public would accept it so soon.