The state of the art quantum computers you can find at university labs are completely and utterly useless compared to classical computers, with the exception of extremely contrived problems (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5).
I swear this quantum computer nonsense is shilling designed to make Q followers look like they just accept things at face value. The only apparent advantage a quantum computer has over a classical computer is a theoretical (asymptotic, worst case) speedup on some classes of algorithms. A classical computer can simulate a quantum computer, i.e perform the exact same computations. And like I just said, the best quantum computers cannot get a real speedup on almost any problems. There is no super secret quantum research and engineering group that is twenty years ahead of everyone else, because it is a monumental effort of design and engineering and iteration that no single Einstein could do on his own.
As a programmer, I roll my eyes when I hear Q using a quantum computer for machine learning probability calculation.
I'm not a Q supporter either, I just appreciate the research the Q community did and does into these Deep State pedos and human traffickers(let's just call it what it is, they're slavers), and how Q/the Q community exposed them. For that, I am grateful.
Q can be a great spectator sport. Tons of interesting people and perspectives. Yes, there is stupid and some “out there” stuff. But overall, at 60, the last 3 years have been the thrill ride of my life. Amazing time to be alive.
Quantum computing can in fact only offer an improvement in speed, given what is understood about the fundamental underlying physics. There is no algorithm a quantum computer can run that the computer you are using to read this cannot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis
Point noted. Thanks for the reality check. I'd gotten in the habit of talking about quantum computing flippantly mostly when I get caught up in an exciting moment.
I will say however, I'm sort of a believer that time travel, and thus technology from the future being involved. However, you're correct in that... I should chose the time and place to just make silly comments.
With enough time, money, & control of narrative I could macrome a litany of events and dates which I could then make ‘happen’ in the future giving you some false sense of me being ‘all knowing’ or having some looking glass technology.
I think we are taking some of this a bridge too far.
They have a time line viewer (chrono) and there are several converging time lines we are following. From personal experience, I can tell you both champagne and chocolate covered raisons go quite well with popcorn.
So............ is the media out there digging to prove that Durham is real since Trump said that??? They used to go after every other red dot he put out there. Ask yourselves why they wouldn't pursue this?
DS probably spent the past three years trying to locate Durham to plan an “accident” for him. Q-Post #3673 has strange wording and an interesting question.
This is a weird place for this to come up, but I'm super into acronym word games. So I'll bite with a couple off the top of the head. If you were asking a leading questions, and had some thoughts yourself, I'd love to hear them as well.
I’m more getting the feeling that there’s some sleight of hand surrounding this Durham character. Imagine the white hats announcing (effectively, to the DS) that they have this powerhouse attorney going after the traitors. The DS would surely go into overdrive trying to figure out how to stop this Durham from being successful one way or another. Pointing the DS attention onto Durham would alleviate risk to any other prosecutor(s) leading the charge against traitors. Q-Post #4773 alludes to this.
The USS Durham was also a name of a navy ship That was stationed in the Arabian Sea during the Vietnam war and was sunk for target practice in 2020, So they sunk The USS Durham and used it for target practice. That really gets the gears turning... lol
Didn’t answer your question in my last reply. I don’t think Q implied Durham is us. Q has stated that disinformation is necessary so perhaps both Durham and the Q OP were used to attract the DS attention in one direction while the MI were hard at work dismantling the DS without detection. It’s just a theory.
I think this Q post aligns with the OP's image. Could March 26 be the "Month/Day" Durham was activated and could that statement from trump on March 26 be the signal that the "Q public campaign" has initiated?
That’s an optimistic thought. If and when Q posts again - and I do believe he/they will - it will most certainly be grounds for celebration in this community.
What's more real, Durham or Sandy Hook? Durham or Biden won? Durham or Hussein's birth certificate? Durham or Pizzagate was debunked? Durham or Covid is a pandemic?
Remember all the Tom Clancy books where the 3 letter groups "create" someone. The Q team knew for years they were going to need someone like Durham to be the focus (and maybe do nothing?) So they created the figure, his history, got him appointed to a U.S. Attorney position. But he doesn't really exist (maybe?) so no one could take him out?
This is all so fantastical my imagination is running wild!
But there was also this. His assistant resigned. Supposition was that she was done acting like the "barrier" between gathering up evidence and keeping it clean for the prosecutors.
George News (at least George News on YouTube) was shown to very likely be a scam from India or elsewhere just taking sources from other news channels an dispensing hope that people wanted to hear (From Evaspre or w/e that mods name was). Is there a reason I should trust them either? Why is the DJT statement in black and white with different text font than the other statements? Why does it read unprofessionally? I'll believe it's fake until hard proof.
This is a good sign. Trump never impulsively broadcasts weakness and frustration. This is either intentional deception to make the swamp think Durham's investigation is going poorly, or more hopefully a signal that it's time for Durham to release his report.
Remember, early this month Mark Meadows told us that Trump is planning his next administration. Pompeo told us in Nov. that there would be a smooth transition to a second Trump admin. Is this statement the signal for Durham to release his report? Would make sense since it was released on a Friday. Gives him the weekend to do whatever final touches/preparations he needs before releasing it on Monday.
Anyone clicking on that link, would need to click on the "metadata" option on the upper left corner to see the metadata.
I made a link to the metadata but then noticed that it didn't actually go to that section, but to the first section, which is the comparison between the original and the overlay.
I already screencapped the metadata part where it says the picture has been photoshopped, at least I think: https://files.catbox.moe/ghckmn.png
The answers to those questions were given by Q himself.
The Utah AG Huber had a gigantic team of lawyers working on something big, which STILL hasn't shown up. Search Q drops for Huber, it's a treasure trove.
I'm going to offer a counterpoint that admittedly u/NessInOnett posited in this very thread before me.
Durham may be a fictional entity set up to guard the alphabet bois. No video can be found of the guy save for a BFX comedian that is clearly acting. Voice only, which anyone can do.
Regarding trump saying "...same abilities..." this character is a front for someone else who has the exact same authority. This person could then execute the actions of someone in Durham's position in complete secrecy in the name of a classified investigation. I need to research more on what authority his supposed position wields though.
Could also be a white hat red herring, hopefully we find out soon!
Someone is doing some kind of espionage work, under the guise of "John Durham", a.k.a. operating off the Deep State's radar. A stealth bomber doesn't show up on a radar, as far as I know so it's very possible President Trump has his own version of "John Durham" doing the heavy digging on the DS.
I saw somewhere on telegram a post where someone was saying that Bruce Willis is playing this role. Then there was a comparison of their faces and features and well...It was kinda interesting..Who makes a good movie? Great actors..Uhm...
I'm at the point where the only explanation that makes sense is either time travelers or quantum computers calculating the future
110% this. Good summary fren.
Just saying, a quantum computer would make all of this a WHOLE lot easier.
That said, great post. ?
Something something Kraken something
The state of the art quantum computers you can find at university labs are completely and utterly useless compared to classical computers, with the exception of extremely contrived problems (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5).
I swear this quantum computer nonsense is shilling designed to make Q followers look like they just accept things at face value. The only apparent advantage a quantum computer has over a classical computer is a theoretical (asymptotic, worst case) speedup on some classes of algorithms. A classical computer can simulate a quantum computer, i.e perform the exact same computations. And like I just said, the best quantum computers cannot get a real speedup on almost any problems. There is no super secret quantum research and engineering group that is twenty years ahead of everyone else, because it is a monumental effort of design and engineering and iteration that no single Einstein could do on his own.
Yup.
As a programmer, I roll my eyes when I hear Q using a quantum computer for machine learning probability calculation.
I'm not a Q supporter either, I just appreciate the research the Q community did and does into these Deep State pedos and human traffickers(let's just call it what it is, they're slavers), and how Q/the Q community exposed them. For that, I am grateful.
Q can be a great spectator sport. Tons of interesting people and perspectives. Yes, there is stupid and some “out there” stuff. But overall, at 60, the last 3 years have been the thrill ride of my life. Amazing time to be alive.
I like to still keep an open mind. These help:
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/fuse
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/forest?highlight=WyJmb3Jlc3QiXQ==
https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/ace
Everyone should read these summaries at least. This is USG publicly stating they are researching the bleeding edge of predictive text and ML.
Quantum computers represent a technological leap.
That doesn't strictly mean speed -- New technology is iterative and in a lot of cases start off weaker, but with greater potential.
Quantum computing can in fact only offer an improvement in speed, given what is understood about the fundamental underlying physics. There is no algorithm a quantum computer can run that the computer you are using to read this cannot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis
Point noted. Thanks for the reality check. I'd gotten in the habit of talking about quantum computing flippantly mostly when I get caught up in an exciting moment.
I will say however, I'm sort of a believer that time travel, and thus technology from the future being involved. However, you're correct in that... I should chose the time and place to just make silly comments.
All puns intended. Thanks the chin check. ?
If only 10 people know about the operation how can they direct the whole military to this operation?
The plan is compartmentalized, like the Manhattan project. Everyone knows only their own mission.
If so, the opsec on this long term op is phenomenal and makes Overlord look simple by comparison.. :O
Who was the austere religious scholar?
Ahh, thank you.
BOOM ?
What is the end goal? The deep states plan?
Nah, I like the word "quantum" more.
I kid, but it is funny how mystical that word can make anything seem.
Yes, when you are in control you can predict 100 percent the outcome .
With enough time, money, & control of narrative I could macrome a litany of events and dates which I could then make ‘happen’ in the future giving you some false sense of me being ‘all knowing’ or having some looking glass technology.
I think we are taking some of this a bridge too far.
They have a time line viewer (chrono) and there are several converging time lines we are following. From personal experience, I can tell you both champagne and chocolate covered raisons go quite well with popcorn.
But, but what is a raison?
It's French for "reason"
An old-ass grape. I'm here all night, folks.
I've taken to a light sprinkle of Sriracha, then a good tossing with my popcorn. But I'm a savage.
Or everyone is playing their role and following a giant script. Unfortunately, that could still mean we've all been had.
So............ is the media out there digging to prove that Durham is real since Trump said that??? They used to go after every other red dot he put out there. Ask yourselves why they wouldn't pursue this?
DS probably spent the past three years trying to locate Durham to plan an “accident” for him. Q-Post #3673 has strange wording and an interesting question.
https://qposts.online/?q=3673&s=postnum
Lol so funny ..accident
Had to read your comment again for laugh times 2 .. Truth but hilarious ty for the laugh , I’m glad I wasn’t drinking my coffee
So they named the Quantum Entity "Durham"?
What possible acronyms are there for durham?
This is a weird place for this to come up, but I'm super into acronym word games. So I'll bite with a couple off the top of the head. If you were asking a leading questions, and had some thoughts yourself, I'd love to hear them as well.
Divine Understanding, Reality Harnessing, Atomic Machine
Decoy Until Real Handlers Are Mitigated
Pretty tired. Probably could do better if I wasn't. Or if I knew more military terminology.
Hey thats a good start anyway haha. Everyone is arguing whether or not hes real or if hes AI. Maybe theres an acronym that explains it all.
I’m more getting the feeling that there’s some sleight of hand surrounding this Durham character. Imagine the white hats announcing (effectively, to the DS) that they have this powerhouse attorney going after the traitors. The DS would surely go into overdrive trying to figure out how to stop this Durham from being successful one way or another. Pointing the DS attention onto Durham would alleviate risk to any other prosecutor(s) leading the charge against traitors. Q-Post #4773 alludes to this.
https://qposts.online/?q=4773&s=postnum
The USS Durham was also a name of a navy ship That was stationed in the Arabian Sea during the Vietnam war and was sunk for target practice in 2020, So they sunk The USS Durham and used it for target practice. That really gets the gears turning... lol
Whoa. My mind is going in circles!
Didn’t answer your question in my last reply. I don’t think Q implied Durham is us. Q has stated that disinformation is necessary so perhaps both Durham and the Q OP were used to attract the DS attention in one direction while the MI were hard at work dismantling the DS without detection. It’s just a theory.
I think this Q post aligns with the OP's image. Could March 26 be the "Month/Day" Durham was activated and could that statement from trump on March 26 be the signal that the "Q public campaign" has initiated?
That’s an optimistic thought. If and when Q posts again - and I do believe he/they will - it will most certainly be grounds for celebration in this community.
I feel like the only thing left for them to post is game over once we see everything wrapped up and done.
What's more real, Durham or Sandy Hook? Durham or Biden won? Durham or Hussein's birth certificate? Durham or Pizzagate was debunked? Durham or Covid is a pandemic?
I've been of the opinion that Durham is a place not a person and that person is Sidney Powell from Durham NC.
Remember all the Tom Clancy books where the 3 letter groups "create" someone. The Q team knew for years they were going to need someone like Durham to be the focus (and maybe do nothing?) So they created the figure, his history, got him appointed to a U.S. Attorney position. But he doesn't really exist (maybe?) so no one could take him out?
This is all so fantastical my imagination is running wild!
But there was also this. His assistant resigned. Supposition was that she was done acting like the "barrier" between gathering up evidence and keeping it clean for the prosecutors.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-aide-john-durham-resigns-doj-russia-probe
its possible especially with that prison pussy hiding facial features, or thats a mask.
Even Rush talked about the guy and didn't seem to know much about him.
head spinning
LOL I thought that Trump statement was a joke. Classic
Or a move, towards what ends? Applying pressure. I like how he is slowly emerging.
Barr
Yep, that’s what I think Stealth Bomber stands for too. B2 bomber = stealth bomber. [B][B] = Bill Barr
https://qalerts.app/?n=3668
As for who or what Durham is, I’m not sure.
Edit: Kek, looks like there’s a stealth bombing downvoter in this thread.
I am sure I heard of a Navy ship titled DURHAM.
JASON DUNHAM DDG 109. Close but not quite
Perhaps this one? https://news.yahoo.com/decommissioned-us-navy-ship-sunk-123651649.html
Would be an interesting name for a salvage team.
Where is the source from the DJT statement? Can't find it on https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/statement-by-donald-j.-trump-45th-president-of-the-united-states-of-america_8
Most recent one was 3/21/21
Pretty sure people say it's photoshopped and fake?
I've seen it posted on George News Telegram, I don't think it's fake.
George News (at least George News on YouTube) was shown to very likely be a scam from India or elsewhere just taking sources from other news channels an dispensing hope that people wanted to hear (From Evaspre or w/e that mods name was). Is there a reason I should trust them either? Why is the DJT statement in black and white with different text font than the other statements? Why does it read unprofessionally? I'll believe it's fake until hard proof.
Alright yeah I see it on RSBN too but I'm still suspiciously cautious
Wow good catch! So since it's clear Durham isn't doing anything, who's the stealth bomber you refer to?
Is it clear? O RLY?
It's as clear as my shower door, Anon
Downvotes unjustified.
This is a good sign. Trump never impulsively broadcasts weakness and frustration. This is either intentional deception to make the swamp think Durham's investigation is going poorly, or more hopefully a signal that it's time for Durham to release his report.
Remember, early this month Mark Meadows told us that Trump is planning his next administration. Pompeo told us in Nov. that there would be a smooth transition to a second Trump admin. Is this statement the signal for Durham to release his report? Would make sense since it was released on a Friday. Gives him the weekend to do whatever final touches/preparations he needs before releasing it on Monday.
Where is the evidence of this statement by DJT? I can't find it on his official site.
It's posted on his Gab
https://gab.com/realdonaldtrump/posts/105958626542358052
The metadata: https://www.fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b6df807cdb11e16d389de25837fb65107609db6e.2221054
Anyone clicking on that link, would need to click on the "metadata" option on the upper left corner to see the metadata.
I made a link to the metadata but then noticed that it didn't actually go to that section, but to the first section, which is the comparison between the original and the overlay.
I already screencapped the metadata part where it says the picture has been photoshopped, at least I think: https://files.catbox.moe/ghckmn.png
Thanks! Yes, Fotoforensics is used to see if pics have been modified, with all other details available on the file. Great tool!
Q+ is just toying with them, at this point
The answers to those questions were given by Q himself.
The Utah AG Huber had a gigantic team of lawyers working on something big, which STILL hasn't shown up. Search Q drops for Huber, it's a treasure trove.
This is an incredible dig. Bravo!
So who is supposed to have hired Durham?
Jeff Sessions
Trust Sessions
On what date did Sessions make this appointment?
That's a hell of a coincidence.
Well I believe he exists otherwise who indited the FBI agent who got probation. I'm praying.
Ok, I get the picture 3-year delta thing, but what does this mean:
i don't get it. :( and I feel dumb. help.
I'm going to offer a counterpoint that admittedly u/NessInOnett posited in this very thread before me.
Durham may be a fictional entity set up to guard the alphabet bois. No video can be found of the guy save for a BFX comedian that is clearly acting. Voice only, which anyone can do.
Regarding trump saying "...same abilities..." this character is a front for someone else who has the exact same authority. This person could then execute the actions of someone in Durham's position in complete secrecy in the name of a classified investigation. I need to research more on what authority his supposed position wields though.
Could also be a white hat red herring, hopefully we find out soon!
doh! ok, that makes perfect sense. How in the heck did I not understand that in the first place? thanks!
yep. you're absolutely right.
Someone is doing some kind of espionage work, under the guise of "John Durham", a.k.a. operating off the Deep State's radar. A stealth bomber doesn't show up on a radar, as far as I know so it's very possible President Trump has his own version of "John Durham" doing the heavy digging on the DS.
See u/NessInOnett's post here: https://greatawakening.win/p/12i3pvveUj/is-john-durham-a-creation-of-the/c/
Soon it might become a popular name, with thousands all over the country to investigate...
thank you!
What if John Durham is a fake name used by Trump?
Think mirror... i think about words like R-A-D-A-R
When I think about radar, I think about stealth
When I think about stealth, I think about B2 bombers.
When I think of B2 Bombers, I think about KFC chicken (Bill Barr [B2]'s favorite fat food)
shits getting silo'd.
i saw post this morning that claimed there is only 2 or 3 pictures of durham
learn how to search
https://www.facebook.com/usaoct/photos/?ref=page_internal
To me Durham looks like Donald Trump in a mustache in this one specific photo.
Interdesting.
So, is "Durham" real? Trump and Q seem to think so.
I saw this earlier on TDW and I thought this was fake? Trump really released this? Hahaha
]Huber[ Evergreen related
https://qanon.pub/#1514
https://qanon.pub/data/media/a4128904d769589d4af9203180be7b0fb8b2ce4d67593b4accc48efad6cad68c.png
THIS Q WE HAVE IT ALL ]HUBER[ ???
Sessions, Whitaker, BB Barr, Durham Jr. They are so fucked
I saw somewhere on telegram a post where someone was saying that Bruce Willis is playing this role. Then there was a comparison of their faces and features and well...It was kinda interesting..Who makes a good movie? Great actors..Uhm...
The 3/26/2018 timestamp is real. I just downloaded the file to check myself. For anyone trying to do the same thing but not finding the results they desire: Here's the image with the details: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/John_H._Durham.jpg
Download it, go to properties, then details on the top tab.