That is why BSMSM doesn't count for shit. I only take what my President tells me. Either as a direct message, something I need to do my homework on or a combination of both. He is going to set out what he said he would last week. The CONgress critters still don't get it. Most of them didn't read it before voting, but not our President. His people were on that like shit on velcro.
Trump just invoked the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 while signing the COVID bill, allowing him to redline areas that must be addressed. He can hold and allocate funds where he wants for 45 days. Considering only 6 went against it in the first place, they could possibly override the veto easily. The Pocket Veto he went with, obviously, which is a great delay...but again, if it sits for too long, it automatically becomes law. He put congress in a box to:
POTUS is a genius. If he signs something or says anything, he has reasoned it out. We might not understand his logic but then we don't have to understand. 5D chess
Some analysis from CTH at the link. I don't think they can prevent him from doing anything regardless of what it says. It would end up in court, after the fact.
It was a pocket veto. He ignores it and they couldnt do anything no recourse for them.
He has his reasons. Everybody watch the movie.
That's all there is to do...watch....
Because he kicks it back with his edits, they refuse, then THEY are the ones fucking the American people over, not him by vetoing it. They either capitulate or commit political suicide by denying people the help they need
Trump said he signed bill, and that it's good news with more information forthcoming.
Chad Pergram from Fox has more news about the red lining and additions like section 230 rescission and voter fraud investigation.
I'm just waiting to hear from Trump.
Why would Trump sign a bill? The obvious answer is if not signing left him in a more weak position. How could this occur?
Lets for the sake of argument assume that the Senate had enough vote to override veto. If so, by not signing the bill, Trump would send a clear signal that he intended on using the insurrection act, His veto would have been overridden, and he would have exposed his hand for no gain.
Let me ask you this? When the legislative branch changes the law, which is in this case dealing with the presidents ability to call in action the insurrection act, when does that change take effect. For some reason I think it is not immediate, but takes affect at the beginning of the next legislative session, which begins on January 3rd 2021.
Therefore, Trump may at his digression use the Insurrection Act under the old law before Jan 3rd 2021. He loses nothing, and give away nothing.
He redlined it, meaning he sent his edits back to congress.
Does anyone think this "redlining" has anything to do with the picture of him pointing to the flag or of the red line mentioned by Q?
hmmm...? Red line #3 is regarding Pence or Pelosi move.
Edit: Qdrop# 4414
Ya Think???
If he signed it will the red-lining matter? I’m not sure I understand .
Where are you getting this? All the headlines are saying he straight up signed it.
"All the headlines." Suddenly they've developed journalistic integrity? Come now.
Yeah obviously the headlines are fucked. I wanted to see where he got his info!
But I think I found it! https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-from-the-president-122720/
That is why BSMSM doesn't count for shit. I only take what my President tells me. Either as a direct message, something I need to do my homework on or a combination of both. He is going to set out what he said he would last week. The CONgress critters still don't get it. Most of them didn't read it before voting, but not our President. His people were on that like shit on velcro.
His deputy press secretary tweeted that he redlined it.
https://mobile.twitter.com/JuddPDeere45/status/1343364839801049091
u/noquo89 Source?
NO, that was in the NDAA bill which he vetoed.
Trump just invoked the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 while signing the COVID bill, allowing him to redline areas that must be addressed. He can hold and allocate funds where he wants for 45 days. Considering only 6 went against it in the first place, they could possibly override the veto easily. The Pocket Veto he went with, obviously, which is a great delay...but again, if it sits for too long, it automatically becomes law. He put congress in a box to:
POTUS is a genius. If he signs something or says anything, he has reasoned it out. We might not understand his logic but then we don't have to understand. 5D chess
Some analysis from CTH at the link. I don't think they can prevent him from doing anything regardless of what it says. It would end up in court, after the fact.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/12/27/after-promises-from-house-and-senate-president-trump-signs-covid-19-relief-and-omnibus-spending-bill/#more-206497
It was a pocket veto. He ignores it and they couldnt do anything no recourse for them. He has his reasons. Everybody watch the movie. That's all there is to do...watch....
Because he kicks it back with his edits, they refuse, then THEY are the ones fucking the American people over, not him by vetoing it. They either capitulate or commit political suicide by denying people the help they need
He redlined it? https://thepalmierireport.com/trump-signs-covid-relief-bill/
Trump said he signed bill, and that it's good news with more information forthcoming. Chad Pergram from Fox has more news about the red lining and additions like section 230 rescission and voter fraud investigation. I'm just waiting to hear from Trump.
Think logically:
The logic:
Why would Trump sign a bill? The obvious answer is if not signing left him in a more weak position. How could this occur?
Lets for the sake of argument assume that the Senate had enough vote to override veto. If so, by not signing the bill, Trump would send a clear signal that he intended on using the insurrection act, His veto would have been overridden, and he would have exposed his hand for no gain.
Let me ask you this? When the legislative branch changes the law, which is in this case dealing with the presidents ability to call in action the insurrection act, when does that change take effect. For some reason I think it is not immediate, but takes affect at the beginning of the next legislative session, which begins on January 3rd 2021.
Therefore, Trump may at his digression use the Insurrection Act under the old law before Jan 3rd 2021. He loses nothing, and give away nothing.
I hope you are right.
That would be best case scenario. Then Obama 2.0 couldn’t use it to go after conservatives on peaceful marches.
Rules/Laws only apply to those who follow them. What makes you think the criminal politician would be limited by any thing on the books.
The power of the executive includes keeping the peace. One branch can't limit another's in this way. Notice how no one officially is commenting.
Nothing can stop what is coming.