Boooom!
BOOM!
Boooooooom!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Details matter, like what produced the number 946 of the Q "drop"?
No, the 946 is simply that it was the 946th Q drop. However that number can be used to refer back to the Q drop. By tweeting at 9:46, the President might be saying to look back at the 946th Q drop so that I can send you a message by the Q back channel. Might be something, might be nothing. Might just be that he tweeted at 9:46 in the morning. But when he included 3 exclamation marks that match up with the 3 exclamation marks in his tweet, he is very likely telling you boom, boom, boom that something is going on, has happened, or is about to happen.
I linked you some videos so that you can catch on.
Why is all of this important? Plausible Deniability. It's more of a "wink wink" way to communication, but can be dismissed as being a weird coincidence.
Have you counted how many of his thousands of tweets have 3 question marks?
Also, you made a leap to "wink, wink" with no evidence. I could "watch for 10:15 and the crown!!" and any person could later relate the word crown to anything, gold, Hastings, George III. Anyone can see animals in clouds or popcorn ceilings even though no one in all likelihood created the animal looking pattern intentionally.
Goldman Sachs. Italy did it. Us ambassador of Italy used to work for Goldman Sachs. Lewis eisenberg of Florida https://nationsinaction.org/2021/01/press-release-voter-fraud/?fbclid=IwAR1Z5bLEa3SjiMUG8VpwUnuCuPayJOzxCMqA4jykAIT1U_8r3_XszpNCMLE
"I mean to" I do not understand that. Did you mean too rather than to? What does qincidents mean? What is your evidence of being real and how many exactly? If people are going to put things like this out and believe them should they not be detailed and provable? I deal in science and facts.