2
anon123456789 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our government and teachers are pounding in the rainbow flag and crt into kids heads. China is banning propaganda and pushing their children so they can lead the world one day

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

Barack Hussein Obama. He was supposed to be in office for two terms. He was sending all our jobs over seas making us weak. Clinton was supposed to finish us off with globalism. When trump got elected the polls were flooded. They didn’t stand a chance

3
anon123456789 3 points ago +3 / -0

LW is a grifter turned thief when he couldn’t get a Trump endorsement

2
anon123456789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t argue and I dissipate any division anyone is trying to sow. The statistics keep coming from studies. They’ll make their mind up eventually. If they don’t then it’s not worth fighting over for me

2
anon123456789 2 points ago +2 / -0

Climate, COP26. By my tree Climate debates forget the main decision maker of CO2 emissions, the consumer. The Credit Suisse “Treeprint” study attempts to model the impact of Western lifestyles, to translate it into reforestation needs. States did not all shine in Glasgow during COP26. But the major absentee from climate debates remains the individual responsibility of the consumer. Credit Suisse's calculations are cruel to the Western lifestyles of the ultimate CO2 emissions decision maker. His “Treeprint” study models the impact in terms of reforestation needs: twelve birch trees for a steak and fries, thirteen eucalyptus trees for two café lattes and 400 trees for a distant two-week trip in a five-star hotel. EDITO-COP26: lessons from failure The "ideal" consumer in the eyes of the Paris agreement would only make a short plane trip each year, would not drive more than 5,000 kilometers per year, and would give up red meat, beer and coffee. The good news is that 120 trees would be enough to offset its emissions. Always better than burning a candle.

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

MySpace announced a name change just before it died

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dumb question. The shot replicates dna so the body doesn’t see it as foreign. If it has already has a copy of someone else’s dna can it keep copying as it jumps host to host?

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s making fun of the Biden regime worldwide “democracy dies in darkness” and “democracy is back” idiots

2
anon123456789 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s dancing around a sensitive subject like a ballerina

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

The government in America is using Covid as their excuse to install who they want in office. That’s why they’re cooking the books and calling anyone that disagrees with the numbers and them changing election laws without due process over night terrorists.

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cytokine storm. Make the body attack itself.

1
anon123456789 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was after Bill Gates Ted talk about how vaccines can reduce the population in a humanitarian way.

2
anon123456789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think I remember Q saying something about that. There’s a ton of them tricks if you look it up

view more: Next ›