yeah he does. It's a fine line you have to have your foundations set strong before venturing down these rabbit holes.
As a Christian I know what I believe, and I've found that there are truths and mechanics to the universe and creation that are simply that, truths and mechanics.
These are ideas that are embraced by the "pagans" and so on, and ignored by religious Christians. I think that's a mistake, but the problem is that when you research truths and mechanics you end up getting THEIR beliefs and religious or lack thereof mixed in and you have to view it objectively.
Right, the inherit unintentional bias is there and you have to extract the truth and reconcile it with your foundations. That step gets lost in the shuffle far too often, thank you for the reminder.
Im glad that Parkes at least recognizes that and says "the source, or God as some of you may know it as"
Right, Simon calls God "the source" for example.
yeah he does. It's a fine line you have to have your foundations set strong before venturing down these rabbit holes.
As a Christian I know what I believe, and I've found that there are truths and mechanics to the universe and creation that are simply that, truths and mechanics.
These are ideas that are embraced by the "pagans" and so on, and ignored by religious Christians. I think that's a mistake, but the problem is that when you research truths and mechanics you end up getting THEIR beliefs and religious or lack thereof mixed in and you have to view it objectively.
Thus important to keep grounded.
Right, the inherit unintentional bias is there and you have to extract the truth and reconcile it with your foundations. That step gets lost in the shuffle far too often, thank you for the reminder.
Im glad that Parkes at least recognizes that and says "the source, or God as some of you may know it as"
Yes, I came across Parkes only a few weeks ago. As soon as he mentioned "source" I added him to my list of "must follow".