I don't know what kind of a clearance a First Lady has but I would guess none. She is supposed to know nothing about ops, and even if she knows something, officially she doesn't know. From her perspective of the narrative, it's over.
do you know how i know you're a communist? because you use their same tactics. hostility, intimidation, finger pointing, attempt to silence and remove.
Call me wrong but I don't think you get it, freedomfighter1976. You're thinking/talking like there are just random observations occurring here. As if the outcome is still in doubt.
That's not what this space is about. The outcome is not in doubt, and this space is dedicated to following the clues laid out. People who start talking your brand of negativity are immediately shut down, because their MINDSET is not sligned with the purpose here, and their comments only serve to distract.
This isn't tw/fb where you can get butthurt, call people communists, and not get pushback. Do that BS elsewhere. If you're here, get aligned with the purpose. At very least, shut up read and learn. Not a time for grandstanding.
Multiple contingencies in the plan. Who knows where we're going to end up at this right?
If I'm going to be honest, Pompeo may be better equipped to deal against China as a war-time President. Trump may be a bit too honest and big-hearted to be a war-time President. Pompeo seems more cunning and more willing to engage in dishonest tactics when it comes to dealing with the enemy.
guna be honest, this sounds like she isnt planning on being first lady again.
I don't know what kind of a clearance a First Lady has but I would guess none. She is supposed to know nothing about ops, and even if she knows something, officially she doesn't know. From her perspective of the narrative, it's over.
Why have you been posting a lot of concern troll, unrelated to Q comments?
Odd you just pop up here yet would be better suited to TDW....
I agree with you. Take the fear somewhere else.
do you know how i know you're a communist? because you use their same tactics. hostility, intimidation, finger pointing, attempt to silence and remove.
thats what the left is known for.
obvious plant is obvious.
Call me wrong but I don't think you get it, freedomfighter1976. You're thinking/talking like there are just random observations occurring here. As if the outcome is still in doubt.
That's not what this space is about. The outcome is not in doubt, and this space is dedicated to following the clues laid out. People who start talking your brand of negativity are immediately shut down, because their MINDSET is not sligned with the purpose here, and their comments only serve to distract.
This isn't tw/fb where you can get butthurt, call people communists, and not get pushback. Do that BS elsewhere. If you're here, get aligned with the purpose. At very least, shut up read and learn. Not a time for grandstanding.
You're dooming on Every.Single.Post. dude. Either you're a bit brain fried or you're here to demoralize.
If you're brain fried, take heed from the positivity of Q. If you're here to demoralize, seeya.
I think people are a little too emotional with the downvotes here. Q never said the plan guaranteed Trump second administration.
"Military is the only way"
I'm not ruling out the possibility Pompeo/Flynn administration.
but then what about all the people in trumps circle constantly affirming that we "will have another 4 years of trump"?
Multiple contingencies in the plan. Who knows where we're going to end up at this right?
If I'm going to be honest, Pompeo may be better equipped to deal against China as a war-time President. Trump may be a bit too honest and big-hearted to be a war-time President. Pompeo seems more cunning and more willing to engage in dishonest tactics when it comes to dealing with the enemy.
Read that paragraph again and see if you change your mind
Which one?