There is no longer any doubt in my mind, this was a sting op and dude with the horns is screaming "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!"
Distraction if i've ever seen one.
I thought that immediately when it was reported because in normal instances ill-gotten evidence is not admissible. However, under EO and Military court law, all corroborated evidence is admissible.
I honestly have no idea if this guy WAS antifa, a patriot, or some undercover military. At this point I wonder if it really matters.
after seeing a photo of him standing beside rudy
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/giuliani-jake-angeli-capitol-riot/
Then getting a closer look at the tent Trump watched jan 6th from (pre speech)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR1iL_M9Mm93aaD_aMCCUwkeIoXe5yQbteDByQk3PmD7oyZTggRPXOnNzr0&v=14YIDUMl9IE&feature=youtu.be
There is no longer any doubt in my mind, this was a sting op and dude with the horns is screaming "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!" Distraction if i've ever seen one.
Distraction from what? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/08/capitol-attack-computer-theft-information-security
Why would stolen evidence be permisable? Maybe MP knows.
EO 2018. Not stolen. Confiscated.
Ask an MP? Military police?
Military tribunals do not care how evidence was obtained if said evidence can be corroborated.
Military courts don't have the same evidence restrictions.
BOOM +1 Insightful
THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT.
I thought that immediately when it was reported because in normal instances ill-gotten evidence is not admissible. However, under EO and Military court law, all corroborated evidence is admissible.
Well done!
To help answer your last question:
What makes you think the taking of the laptop was about evidence?
The op had to look legit. What was it meant to convey or rather induce? How did Pelosi react?
OP succeeded. Zugzwang.
Hmm, could be.