Yes that's odd, they would have said 46th if they were referring to Biden. And the fact that they said 59th just seems so unusual, but maybe I am wrong.
It would be 59th either way (relected presidents get 2 inaugurations so this number would naturally be higher than the number of presidents), Trump also said he wouldn't go to the inauguration on january 20th, and his recently emergency declaration lasts until january 24th.
"so who the fuck knows whats gonna happen anymore" lmao this has been the fuckin mood since the 3rd man. The fog of war is thicker than jerry nadler. You got LARP's goin around, you got fuckin weird air activity, you got a whole bunch of vague shit and radio silence from Trump team, 15k troops in DC...the only thing we know for sure is that some shit is definitely about to go down and if the commie traitors are about to get hit they're gonna have no fucking idea what hit them.
I understand that. I think it would be more natural to say the inauguration of the 46th president if it were going to Biden. Not once has the White House or Trump even hinted that Biden will be inaugurated.
Since there have been several presidents that have served multiple terms, there have been more inaugurations than presidents. It is the 59th time a president has been inaugurated, it has nothing to do with Trump being 45th or Biden potentially being 46th.
No, I understand that. What I'm saying is that wouldn't it be natural to say the 46th Presidential Inauguration if it were to be Biden? Why would they say 59th, even if it is the 59th total inauguration? They would say 46th Presidential Inauguration, as in the inauguration of the 46th president. Maybe I'm just reading into it a little bit too much, but either way, there has never been a mention of anything going to Biden from the White House or Trump.
IMO, it would be phrased "the Inauguration of the 46th president." 59th Presidential Inauguration refers to the number of times an inauguration has happened. There is nothing atypical about this being referred to as the 59th inauguration.
Yes that's odd, they would have said 46th if they were referring to Biden. And the fact that they said 59th just seems so unusual, but maybe I am wrong.
It would be 59th either way (relected presidents get 2 inaugurations so this number would naturally be higher than the number of presidents), Trump also said he wouldn't go to the inauguration on january 20th, and his recently emergency declaration lasts until january 24th.
So who the fuck knows what's gonna happen anymore
"so who the fuck knows whats gonna happen anymore" lmao this has been the fuckin mood since the 3rd man. The fog of war is thicker than jerry nadler. You got LARP's goin around, you got fuckin weird air activity, you got a whole bunch of vague shit and radio silence from Trump team, 15k troops in DC...the only thing we know for sure is that some shit is definitely about to go down and if the commie traitors are about to get hit they're gonna have no fucking idea what hit them.
I've seen leftoids on twitter going insane about not knowing Trump's whereabouts or actions.
No matter what goes down, that man will always live in those people's head rent free.
One heck of a property developer - he's about to rehabilitate their cranial real estate.
...because the few braincells they have left are going to be knocked lose by the impact.
“due to the emergency conditions resulting from the 59th Presidential Inauguration ...”
Look at the language-
...conditions RESULTING(not surrounding)
The inauguration of a foreign controlled CCP puppet is the emergency.
The constitutional date for inauguration is March 4th, and if Trump gets inaugurated it will be on that date.
I'm hoping so, I guess we'll see.
I understand that. I think it would be more natural to say the inauguration of the 46th president if it were going to Biden. Not once has the White House or Trump even hinted that Biden will be inaugurated.
Lol nice Biden impersonation
Since there have been several presidents that have served multiple terms, there have been more inaugurations than presidents. It is the 59th time a president has been inaugurated, it has nothing to do with Trump being 45th or Biden potentially being 46th.
No, I understand that. What I'm saying is that wouldn't it be natural to say the 46th Presidential Inauguration if it were to be Biden? Why would they say 59th, even if it is the 59th total inauguration? They would say 46th Presidential Inauguration, as in the inauguration of the 46th president. Maybe I'm just reading into it a little bit too much, but either way, there has never been a mention of anything going to Biden from the White House or Trump.
IMO, it would be phrased "the Inauguration of the 46th president." 59th Presidential Inauguration refers to the number of times an inauguration has happened. There is nothing atypical about this being referred to as the 59th inauguration.