Checkmate Security Detail Website - 10 days missing in stock photo
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
10 days of darkness? we had some guess yesterday about checkmate being a specops on our side maybe
EDIT: look the pattern 10-11-12 | 13-14-15 | 16-17-18 | 19 - 20 - 21 | 22 -
It was probably printed intentionally like this, if you sum up 3 days per page, you get that the 23 should be really a 22 to be legit...
This.... How many coincidences before it's mathematically impossible...
Do you want something more? that website contains a backlink VIA consensus (https://c.sharethis.mgr.consensu.org/portal-v2.html) related at GDPR to an entity in Europe affiliated with the EU, that works in Marketing, Data, AD, Privacy, and so much bla bla, so another Think-tank, but guess located where? Belgium....And who's heading in there Tomorrow? Kansas
Coincidence? You decide.
Officially: IAB Europe is the European-level association for the digital marketing and advertising ecosystem Let's dig a second more, this is enough for me:
What is IAB Europe? IAB Europe is the European-level association for the digital marketing and advertising ecosystem. Through its membership of media, technology and marketing companies and national IABs, its mission is to lead political representation and promote industry collaboration to deliver frameworks, standards and industry programmes that enable business to thrive in the European market.
Weeks have 7 days, so that planner probably has 4 days on the left side and 3 on the right. You can see the month calendars in the rightmost column (why there are only 3 on that side). So days work out right.
True. However, if you count it out based on that layout, the 23rd would fall on the first column on the left page. Here it is shown on the right page.
Good point, they dont work out right.
Okay so with all the back and forth over this detail, are we in agreement that it seems like it's done purposely? Meaning, the dates don't line up properly and it's a deliberate hint?
January starts it, but June ends it?
Toke in account dude, still it doesn't work, if that was a full week, 23 would have been on the left side, instead, is on the right page, look well, it's intentional
The calendar is laid out 4 days on the left, 3 on the right. If you count it out based on that layout, the 23rd would fall on the first column on the left page. Here it is shown on the right page.
The calendar is for June 2017. It shows June 12th in the middle of the week, but June 12th, 2017 was a Monday.
Toke in account dude but, still it doesn't work, if that was a full week, 23 would have been on the left side, instead, is on the right page
It makes sense, and i thought about that, but there's a detail you are missing out, even if that was still it doesn't work, if that was a full week, 23 would have been on the left side as page starter, instead, is on the right page as continuation, look well, For me, it's intentional
Probably it is a week format calendar with 4 on the left and 3 on the right page.
But that still doesn't make sense because 23 would be on a different page.
Puzzling
Thought about, but it cannot be, if we have series of seven (days)
[1-2-3-4 | 5-6-7]
[8-9-10-11 | 12-13-14]
[15-16-17-18 | 19-20-21]
[22-23-24-25 | ....... ]
Note this shows that layout is already wrong, following this pattern, you would have the 12 as first number on right page, instead in that calendar, you have it as last number on left page (so if we assume it's 7 days we miss one day before the 12)
also, if we continue counting following the calendar in image, using 12 as last number left page, we do
[1-2-3-4 | 5-6-7]
[9-10-11-12 | 13-14-15]
[16-17-18-19 | 20-21-22]
[23-24-25-26 | ....... ]
You would have the 23 as first day in left page, instead you have it in first column right page
Yes I came to the same conclusion.. I think it is a 4+3 layout but 23 is on the wrong side. It's pretty weird.
I don't think there is even a way to do it tearing out whole months because a 31 day month only causes a 3 day offset not 4. Maybe tear out Feb and Mar on a leap year, that would be 4 days?