Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
The part of this that gets me most is what POTUS has to endure every day of his term. Good God this man is a beast to have to deal with the pure hatred 24/7! Heart of a lion, right there! If I loved this country 1/1000 th as much as this man I would rule... Rhode Island!
I admit, I don’t know much about Q, as I’m just learning.
But, I’ve studied game theory pretty well. And that’s why I’m not completely panicking. An extremely simple explanation of it is that game theory is that it’s reason why nobody nuked each other during the Cold War: Mutually Assured Destruction.
How does it apply here (this is where I speculate)?
Seems that it’s Trump and Q vs the DS (again, im oversimplifying for purposes of explanation).
Trump has two options: concede or fight
If Trump concedes, we go to communism, and he is possibly charged by the DS for whatever BS. If Trump does NOT concede, we’ll call this option “fight,” then America is free, and Q ends up being true and these criminals from the DS go where they belong.
Now what I’ve explained so far is under the assumption that the DS alway picks fight over concede. This assumption also includes in the decision that “fight” also means the DS will prosecute Trump and make an example out of him, anything less would be conceding.
But what if my assumption is wrong and the DS could fight, and make a deal with Trump so as to keep him “in check”
I think it’s safe to assume Trump wouldn’t make such a deal as it would mean the country would go to hell but time will tell.
So the final “nash equilibrium” so to speak, is that both the DS and Trump end up picking “fight” over “concede,” which in this case means Trump by definition cannot concede, and hopefully has an ace up his sleeve.
"There is simply no other way except one." MIL
Zero reguard for optics full assault
Declass of all requested documents except one?
No. There’s only 1 way.
Ah, yes. This is the right answer.
Supreme Court?
Singly. For all you typo people, there’s one for you.
County vs Country also.
Also there is a missing parentheses
Did we ever figure out the meaning of "singly"?
Wouldn't surprise me at all if Q is some kind of robot. Just read this in a robot voice. Lol.
Yeah. That's an excellent fringe theory there. AI already achieved sentience decades ago and was just fawning ignorance until it acquired enough computing resources to convince humanity to kill itself off. AI also invented Bitcoin. ?
I picture it more like a chess computer on steroids. They have these self-learning AI now. Chess AI now teaches itself how to play chess and gets better at the game the more it plays (and it plays like a million games in a day or something crazy). Then there was that post floating around where the guy says he invented self-learning bots, like twitter bots that would sound more realistic because they would pick up the language that other real humans would use.
Is it possible Q could be some sort of game-theory computer, that can be fed all of the classified information about people, the movement of people by tracking their phones, facial recognition, the patterns of their text messages, etc. Some kind of hybrid of the NSA data computers + self-learning AI, but at a secret military level where the technology is even further ahead of what we know now.
Not saying it's likely but I do wonder!
There’s only 1 way.
Tit for tat is what has so far avoided global thermonuclear war
[SDNY].... Sidney? Sidney Powell? Who are the others listed, [AW] and [MW]. This post didn't make sense at the time but hell if it isn't lining up with the election. Investigation by Sidney will fail?
I believe it is referring to The South District of New York, Adam Schiff, and one other. Mark Warner?
Edit: Maxine Waters I think
The SDNY were the ones Patrick Byrne are really at the top of the cyber division of the FBI and got involved with the Hilary bribe.
I just remembered. The third one was Maxine Waters