I THINK I SEE THE PLAN.

posted 3 years ago by ThaVos 3 years ago by ThaVos +85 / -0

I have been reading lots of posts, listening to heaps of people and reading Q posts. This is my thinking. A while ago I listened to a podcast with Candace Owens and she was interviewing a general and he was “Based” as we say. He spent the back end talking about how Space is the new arms race who ever dominates space will be the next power for the next 100 years. Something to that effect. He mentioned being able to control blackouts and use them as a weapon. Recently I have been reading Q posts and seeing what is happening with the Space force and SpaceX make me think. SpaceX launches are a part of a massive military take over of space to be in control of everything, power comms satellites everything when this all goes down. Today I was listening to someone say they are able to use Space Force to communicate directly with the world. Related Info

https://youtu.be/lLiwKqL5nko
https://youtu.be/Kwgu3jeaMvQ
Q Post 209 Why did BO scuttle the shuttle program? What is SpaceX? Expand your thinking. Q Thoughts.
Q Post 437 2011 Shuttle Program terminated by Hussein. US loses space dominance. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/08/09/obama-administration-knew-about-north-koreas-miniaturized-nukes.html IRAN Nuke deal. NK Nuke/Missile Tech. SpaceX. NASA Tech to ? HRC SAPs (private server). Connected. $$$,$$$,$$$.00 (pockets). EYE OF RA. Left eye [marker]. Symbolism. EVIL. STUPID. JUSTICE. Q
Check out eye of RA on Wiki The Eye's violent aspect defends Ra against the agents of disorder that threaten his rule

30 comments

30 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (30)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– inquimous 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Used to fiddle around with lasers in the 80s. Very destructive ones were already around but huge and took huge power--no way they go into space. However, all we need now is much smaller because all we need is to damage the military satellites that have been put up to damage our own. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12601856/china-space-supremecy-satellites-stone-age-douglas-mackinnon/

permalink parent save report block reply

– DeathRayDesigner 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Or the laser equivalent of a deringer. At Boeing, in the 1980s, our laser physics group had devised a scheme to put a single-shot chemical laser in the envelope of a 155mm cannon shell. The idea was that a 155mm cannon could be used to fire it at a suitable target. It doesn't take much imagination to think something like that could be useful in a maneuvering spacecraft, either as a single shot or multiple shots.