Euro...I had never heard of the Overton Window until reading about on Wiki...I am doing research on why orgs like Antifa/BLM push such radical ideas as norms and expect population to accept those said ideas...
When every article they publish ends up tracing back to 'an anonymous source familiar with people who know about the matter.' after being laundered back and forth between a few times.
Heck with all the stealth editing 'journalists' get up to these days articles end up citing each other as sources.
YAY!
In the 1970's, I was a Journalism major. Often, I think about my favorite professor rolling over in his grave because of the unprofessionalism of so-called journalists today. If there was a hint of personal bias in any articles we wrote, we earned an "F" AND we had to rewrite or we'd flunk the class.
Most news outlets are just repeaters of news stories generated by very few organizations. The smaller news outlets get a story from the Associated Press or the New York Times and put their own spin on it or cover it from a local angle.
That makes sense from a business standpoint, as most local news outlets don't have the huge budgets required to send reporters all over or have knowledgeable analysts on staff who can put complicated stories in context. But this creates the false impression that we have a ton of new sources out there all in agreement, when we really only have a few primary news sources echoed by all the others.
A lot of the insanity of new corps has come from exactly this cycle. One article on some random backwater blog reports a rumor, and then the rest play telephone until it's up on the big screen as fact across the world.
I feel this is the same amongst some of the Q and pro Trump crowd. You end up reading or hearing something from four or five different people, then realize it's from a single source giving third hand info.
See, I don't see anything wrong with this when it comes to speculation & sharing those ideas & thoughts.
What gets annoying is when speculation gets passed on as fact, and you can't find the original source that led to that speculation to assess it for yourself.
I blame social media for a lot of this because it forces people to generalize, cut source info and cut out important signal words like "supposedly" or "allegedly" or even "I think" in favor of maximizing visibility & fitting a whole complex story into 100 characters. You will never be able to get the facts & nuances of truth out properly with those limitations.
Reporters & analysts need to go back to writing detailed reports & articles/essays, and The People need to go back to taking the time to actually fucken read them.
What do we expect when most of all of our consumed media is ran by 5 corps with the same view and in the same club ?
2 Decades ago there were over 200, now we have 5 Mockingbirds running MKultra on everyone.
Wholeheartedly agree w/u tho.
When theyball spout the same thing its project mocking bird at work. Maybe Murdock doesn't wanna end up in the dust bin of lamestream media. I think its too late
Smart move.
Euro...I had never heard of the Overton Window until reading about on Wiki...I am doing research on why orgs like Antifa/BLM push such radical ideas as norms and expect population to accept those said ideas...
That's a big part of the fucking problem. "News" outlets just report on what everyone else is reporting.
Information laundering
This is an excellent term for what goes on, kudos.
If I’m being honest, I’ve heard it somewhere. Bongino perhaps.
Don Henley Dirty Laundry
Didn’t mass sense before waking up, makes a lot more sense in the era of very fake news
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ju_GLKaH4vM
Bongino used to use it all the time when he mostly talked about the origin of Russiagate.
Misinformation laundering.
They all share the same script.
When every article they publish ends up tracing back to 'an anonymous source familiar with people who know about the matter.' after being laundered back and forth between a few times.
Heck with all the stealth editing 'journalists' get up to these days articles end up citing each other as sources.
The media is one of the first going down. Thank god I was so sick of them.
YAY! In the 1970's, I was a Journalism major. Often, I think about my favorite professor rolling over in his grave because of the unprofessionalism of so-called journalists today. If there was a hint of personal bias in any articles we wrote, we earned an "F" AND we had to rewrite or we'd flunk the class.
Now you get a "A" as long as that bias aligns with your boss's :(
Truth
Murdock getting cold feet??? Better fire Obamas boy running your network. Theybare starting to realize who is gonna win
It’s sad that this is just now happening. Do your own investigative reporting!
Yes!
They are trying to save their own asses from what is coming.
Too late.
Bingo
They are by definition not primary sources lol
The fact this memo is needed at all says a lot about fake news
Good, even tho the NY Post is still garbage, it's one of the lesser garbage news outlets.
Most news outlets are just repeaters of news stories generated by very few organizations. The smaller news outlets get a story from the Associated Press or the New York Times and put their own spin on it or cover it from a local angle.
That makes sense from a business standpoint, as most local news outlets don't have the huge budgets required to send reporters all over or have knowledgeable analysts on staff who can put complicated stories in context. But this creates the false impression that we have a ton of new sources out there all in agreement, when we really only have a few primary news sources echoed by all the others.
Based.
Can I buy, “Whut is INTEGRITY?” For 500£, Bob?
ROCKS
Circular reporting is no bueno. It was used to conjure up 'proof' in the whole Fisagate fiasco.
A lot of the insanity of new corps has come from exactly this cycle. One article on some random backwater blog reports a rumor, and then the rest play telephone until it's up on the big screen as fact across the world.
I feel this is the same amongst some of the Q and pro Trump crowd. You end up reading or hearing something from four or five different people, then realize it's from a single source giving third hand info.
"10 days. Darkness." Becoming "10 Days of Darkness" becoming "two weeks without electricity!!!" is a good example.
Gateway pundit is pretty bad at this
See, I don't see anything wrong with this when it comes to speculation & sharing those ideas & thoughts.
What gets annoying is when speculation gets passed on as fact, and you can't find the original source that led to that speculation to assess it for yourself.
I blame social media for a lot of this because it forces people to generalize, cut source info and cut out important signal words like "supposedly" or "allegedly" or even "I think" in favor of maximizing visibility & fitting a whole complex story into 100 characters. You will never be able to get the facts & nuances of truth out properly with those limitations.
Reporters & analysts need to go back to writing detailed reports & articles/essays, and The People need to go back to taking the time to actually fucken read them.
Rep Gohmert and the raid
I read Reuters "debunking" of the rumor of the Pope arrest. It's proof was "we haven't heard any report of it." Therefore, debunked, I guess?
What do we expect when most of all of our consumed media is ran by 5 corps with the same view and in the same club ?
2 Decades ago there were over 200, now we have 5 Mockingbirds running MKultra on everyone. Wholeheartedly agree w/u tho.
When theyball spout the same thing its project mocking bird at work. Maybe Murdock doesn't wanna end up in the dust bin of lamestream media. I think its too late
I think they are just good at reading the writing on the wall, but I wont give them an easy pass. Murdoch is as much a criminal as the rest of them.