Wictor dropping some hardcore truth bombs on Quodverum
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (113)
sorted by:
Agreed. Even Wictor has some bad misconceptions about Q. But I like to listen to his insights.
Funny how Wictor always seems to end up at the same conclusion as those of us following Q, but he disses those of us following Q... at some point, if he cared to really look into it, he'd have to admit Q is legit.
No matter, his treads are super interesting and he's never doubted Trump. Probably Trump's #1 Fan in the world.
Exactly that’s the thing that doesn’t make any sense is people like Wictor will absolutely bash the hell out of Q while literally saying the exact same things as Q and reaching ALL of the exact same conclusions. W. T. A. F. ??????
The media does such a good disinfo job that the average person ends up only finding a few people they are passionate about - and then everyone else is a letdown.. It's because the people the media portrays well are evil and it's easy to find bad things about them - and the media portrays good people as 'threats' or 'racist' or some other hyperbole. Ron Paul seriously should get some kind of medal for being called 'racist' for his entire career while all he wanted to do was get people to think in terms of liberty.
I think a lot of it is the community.
I’m not anti Q but it’s important to recognize the difference between thinking the president has a plan, and analyzing the options he has available, and the people who turn esoteric nonsense into a self affirming numeric puzzle.
I think that's a bit of inflated ego influencing his perception.
Allows him to see himself as smarter if he downplays the importance of others' views/contributions & of sources that predate his own while leading to same conclusions.
Wictor absolutely has an ego that drives him (in addition to logical curiosity), but he masks it well with his use of logic.
Not saying he's a bad guy & not that he isn't smart, because he is extremely sharp & I really enjoy reading his analyses. But I definitely sense an ego that precedes his better qualities occasionally by causing him to be slightly in denial of things that are really of no consequence to him (or would even be gracious of him) to acknowledge.
Or maybe he really is a wizard with better intuition than any of us that allows him to detect things about Q that we don't... Who knows, lol.
I like him but dislike his buddy
This is my feeling too. He never looked into it. If he did, he would definitely admit Q is legal, but moreimportatnly he might be able to give some more insight into the Q operation
Maybe he doesn’t want to give too much away, so he simply decided to play the role of Doubting Thomas?
Ie, if he were onboard with Q, he knows he might slip up and reveal something that shouldn’t be revealed yet. So by making the decision to simply be publicly dismissive, he avoids setting a trap for himself.
?♂️
Would it be not be because he's role is to give out the right information but deny Q so he can stay platformed and still pass bang on info?
I'm talking outta my arse here as it's the first time I heard of the guy. But if from what I gather in this thread he has been constantly right on most of his claims? If true what is his sources? Does he sound like he is someone with access to the some of the same knowledge pools as Q but perhaps not as high clearance?
Again I'm speaking from ignorance.