They are satanists, they live by symblism and rituals. If you look up the history of the Capital you will find it is the spot they actually use for this kind of stuff. They had their temple under neath the capital where they performed rituals and sacrafice. That is why Nancy Pelosi said after the riot at the Capital they desecrated our temple. The problem is they worship satan but they have to complete the ritual for it to work. So they have no choice but to attend the inauguration. They are damned if they do and damned if they dont.
Was a bad sprain I believe, which he should be over with by now. The whole thing was likely just an a stocked excuse card to be pulled out when needed.
They have no choice because they are compromised. They must do what their handlers command them to do. They must carry out their coup and face the unknown or disobey and face known consequences which are certainly so bad that it made them carry on for this long.
I don't know, but when I hear Tom Hanks and lady gaga set to perform and confused uncle Joe is scared of the ng presence enough to insist they be politically screened and effectively disarmed my ears perk up.
Maybe a false flag event to epstein all the guilty to save the country the humility of public disclosure. The guilty are assumed dead, crimes covered up, but they either gitmo or...
My confusion is....most of the people that need to be arrested are well know....there is no need to have them show up into a “pen.” They aren’t feral hogs.....they just have the personality of one.
So what happens when Biden is sworn in and is informed that secretly martial law was declared and that he's not allowed to do anything? The only way to legally remove a sitting president is impeachment. Q has repeatedly indicated that it is desirable that things are done "by the book" in order to preserve the sanctity of the legal system.
If you don't want the public to think there is a coup, you present the evidence that these people are who you are accusing them of being. You think that "we've just arrested everyone including your new president and now we're in control -- Chris Miller" is going to be easier for the sheep to swallow?
Biden being allowed to publicly pretend to be president (and what of the decisions that he makes? Who is going to tell him he's not allowed to make any decisions? You reckon anyone will notice?) for a couple weeks is not part of the plan. It does not make sense.
The only reason I disagree, is because a Trump's term doesn't extend beyond the 20th, regardless. Either he's sworn in for another term or not or military command comes in
Biden, sworn in, can undo Trump's EOs. If he's sworn in, ceremonially and executes presidential office (which he would in the first 10 days or week whatever) he is president. There is no take backsies.
IMO, people like Juan and BARD are pushing the envelope to try and encourage their audience to stay with them. If the 20th happens, their audience goes. They don't want that.
The only *unless that applies is unless there is a declaration of war, however, again, the swearing in is a problem. A big problem. The military would have to take over either before or straight after. It doesn't jive with law to allow it to go ahead.
Biden could call in UN troops if that were to happen after the fact of swearing in.
They'd be seen as a military insurrection then.
I just listened to part of Bard FM's video and dude... he thinks Merkel "resigned".
Merkel didn't snap resign. She didn't resign. She's not seeking RE-ELECTION.
This was set in motion in 2018.
I'm sorry but this dude talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk. If he's wrong about something so simple like Merkel... he's not doing due diligence in his research.
lol he literally just said "DETAILS MATTER PATRIOTS". Yes! They do!
I would say he does. It would be autistic to play it now though. It has to be a natural progression. Sending in the troops when he did was prepping the public, imo.
I believe the military will wait a week and then publically announce martial law because of the Democrat coup.
Ehh I'm drawing the line at inauguration, anything beyond that sounds like wishful goalpost moving.
That logic could be stretched to something to the tune of 'the military needs one term to gather more evidence for tribunals and secure public opinion by showing how bad things will be under commy control'.
Plus it would be easy to manufacture 'strange events/coincidences' that seem to point to a potential happenings once one gets the amount of control the Uniparty will potentially have if they succeed in rigging gaffmaster general in to office.
They are satanists, they live by symblism and rituals. If you look up the history of the Capital you will find it is the spot they actually use for this kind of stuff. They had their temple under neath the capital where they performed rituals and sacrafice. That is why Nancy Pelosi said after the riot at the Capital they desecrated our temple. The problem is they worship satan but they have to complete the ritual for it to work. So they have no choice but to attend the inauguration. They are damned if they do and damned if they dont.
You've given me a clue to something I could not understand.
Symbolism will be their downfall. Dang.
wonderfully enlightening reply. I did not know about the temple angle.
its too late, either he goes in and is trapped, or he backs out and looks sus af
Another question is, can he actually walk that far?
Hes supposed to be recovering from a broken foot.
Was a bad sprain I believe, which he should be over with by now. The whole thing was likely just an a stocked excuse card to be pulled out when needed.
They have no choice because they are compromised. They must do what their handlers command them to do. They must carry out their coup and face the unknown or disobey and face known consequences which are certainly so bad that it made them carry on for this long.
I don't know, but when I hear Tom Hanks and lady gaga set to perform and confused uncle Joe is scared of the ng presence enough to insist they be politically screened and effectively disarmed my ears perk up. Maybe a false flag event to epstein all the guilty to save the country the humility of public disclosure. The guilty are assumed dead, crimes covered up, but they either gitmo or...
My confusion is....most of the people that need to be arrested are well know....there is no need to have them show up into a “pen.” They aren’t feral hogs.....they just have the personality of one.
There is a need to see justice served. The pen is for optics, at a minimum.
So what happens when Biden is sworn in and is informed that secretly martial law was declared and that he's not allowed to do anything? The only way to legally remove a sitting president is impeachment. Q has repeatedly indicated that it is desirable that things are done "by the book" in order to preserve the sanctity of the legal system.
If you don't want the public to think there is a coup, you present the evidence that these people are who you are accusing them of being. You think that "we've just arrested everyone including your new president and now we're in control -- Chris Miller" is going to be easier for the sheep to swallow?
Biden being allowed to publicly pretend to be president (and what of the decisions that he makes? Who is going to tell him he's not allowed to make any decisions? You reckon anyone will notice?) for a couple weeks is not part of the plan. It does not make sense.
The only reason I disagree, is because a Trump's term doesn't extend beyond the 20th, regardless. Either he's sworn in for another term or not or military command comes in
Biden, sworn in, can undo Trump's EOs. If he's sworn in, ceremonially and executes presidential office (which he would in the first 10 days or week whatever) he is president. There is no take backsies.
IMO, people like Juan and BARD are pushing the envelope to try and encourage their audience to stay with them. If the 20th happens, their audience goes. They don't want that.
The only *unless that applies is unless there is a declaration of war, however, again, the swearing in is a problem. A big problem. The military would have to take over either before or straight after. It doesn't jive with law to allow it to go ahead.
Biden could call in UN troops if that were to happen after the fact of swearing in. They'd be seen as a military insurrection then.
I just listened to part of Bard FM's video and dude... he thinks Merkel "resigned". Merkel didn't snap resign. She didn't resign. She's not seeking RE-ELECTION.
This was set in motion in 2018.
I'm sorry but this dude talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk. If he's wrong about something so simple like Merkel... he's not doing due diligence in his research.
lol he literally just said "DETAILS MATTER PATRIOTS". Yes! They do!
I would say he does. It would be autistic to play it now though. It has to be a natural progression. Sending in the troops when he did was prepping the public, imo.
I think this is possibility.
The inurgeration goes ahead only for troops to remain in the Capitol.
Even if Ttp is removed im not calling quits on it until Miller and the rest are gone.
I like the sound of that word you just invented. May I borrow it? :-)
Yeah.
It doesn't matter how you spell it because its fake any way, might as well give it a fake name.
Ehh I'm drawing the line at inauguration, anything beyond that sounds like wishful goalpost moving.
That logic could be stretched to something to the tune of 'the military needs one term to gather more evidence for tribunals and secure public opinion by showing how bad things will be under commy control'.
Plus it would be easy to manufacture 'strange events/coincidences' that seem to point to a potential happenings once one gets the amount of control the Uniparty will potentially have if they succeed in rigging gaffmaster general in to office.