I think all I really seem as it reads, is that in cases of emergency such as this one Martial Law doesn't really need to be officially declared, its automatically ON. Which then authorizes the military to do whatever is required, including detainment and arrests. As in ALL options available bypassing other laws.
Not exactly. DC is technically not part of the US. We can’t annex it so it appears we are witnessing a “belligerent occupation” - this could end with a ‘peace treaty’ transferring DC to the USA. Kek.
I've bee reading and hearing all this "D.C. not US territory" talk and all, but the Constitution itself is very clear on it status. Article 1, Section 8. Don't care if we're taking it from the cabal, though absolutely not clear how it falls under cabal's property seeing the Consitution as so many insist. And not sure how libtards intend to make it a state when it looks like a Constitutional Amendment is required to do so, 2/3 states. So, have no idea what the discussion is really about, either way. By Article 1, Section 8 it must stay independent of any state, that's all. When did cabal "inherit" it? Sauce?
DC WAS part of the US, at least until 1871. It's been under foreign occupation since. Perhaps this is what Trump meant by taking our country back and restoring government of we the people?
I wonder if it falls under some sort of category like an embassy would for a foreign Nation? Or under some corporate legal loophole designating it as a separate Corporation that provides "management services" for the USA INC
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Pg 750
Details about occupation of sovereign territory.
I think all I really seem as it reads, is that in cases of emergency such as this one Martial Law doesn't really need to be officially declared, its automatically ON. Which then authorizes the military to do whatever is required, including detainment and arrests. As in ALL options available bypassing other laws.
Not exactly. DC is technically not part of the US. We can’t annex it so it appears we are witnessing a “belligerent occupation” - this could end with a ‘peace treaty’ transferring DC to the USA. Kek.
It's part of the U.S., even though it's not a state.
True, but it derives its governance from the US corporation, not the inherent powers of Statehood. It is a “fictitious person.”
Still not a state is it
I've bee reading and hearing all this "D.C. not US territory" talk and all, but the Constitution itself is very clear on it status. Article 1, Section 8. Don't care if we're taking it from the cabal, though absolutely not clear how it falls under cabal's property seeing the Consitution as so many insist. And not sure how libtards intend to make it a state when it looks like a Constitutional Amendment is required to do so, 2/3 states. So, have no idea what the discussion is really about, either way. By Article 1, Section 8 it must stay independent of any state, that's all. When did cabal "inherit" it? Sauce?
DC WAS part of the US, at least until 1871. It's been under foreign occupation since. Perhaps this is what Trump meant by taking our country back and restoring government of we the people?
I wonder if it falls under some sort of category like an embassy would for a foreign Nation? Or under some corporate legal loophole designating it as a separate Corporation that provides "management services" for the USA INC
Could we just return it back into swamp?
Love the smell of napalm in the morning.
Why do you keep mentioning the District Attorney?
What does the DA have to do with washington?
Then why does it have a mayor? ?
Beg my pardon, but HOLY SHIT!
Saving