The supreme court picks that Trump made were all 3 on the Bush Jr. legal team for his election case. Deep state shills. I am just saying PLEASE temper expectations with them, they are very much tied to the deep state. I was really disappointed to see ACB as his pick when I knew she was on that legal team all those years ago.
Ohhh... the same SCOUTS that threw out the appeals in December? Why should we get excited for this? They are globalist shills. If you really need some hopium there are far better sources...
Good. No, I didn’t hear anything in the passed couple of days. Only about a week ago that they were not going to hear a case because the ruling would be moot.
There is quite a large amount of evidence indicating fraud. Ask yourself why no-one in the system wants a court to examine it.
Note I didn't say proof, that is for the court to decide, but only if they allow a case to proceed - or are you ok with denying trials because the MSM keep telling porkies?
ok, then perhaps you might try to understand why the NG are still in DC? You might also want to consider if FEMA is in charge in DC.
Do you do anything except anti-claim? I'm willing to look at evidence to the contrary, but all I'm seeing is evidence that something is afoott, and it isn't a legitimate presedential inauguration.
Or... John Epstein Island Roberts tells them how to vote, again? They decide the plaintiff doesn't have standing, or that the case was submitted too late to have any effect on the matter? ( There's a legal term for that, I forget what it is. laudes? laeches? ) Maybe the SC ignoring the fraud is the point when the military makes the national security call and steps in? Not sure, it doesn't seem like a big enough demonstration that everything's compromised, to me.
Well they've already showed who they are.
Yes.
The supreme court picks that Trump made were all 3 on the Bush Jr. legal team for his election case. Deep state shills. I am just saying PLEASE temper expectations with them, they are very much tied to the deep state. I was really disappointed to see ACB as his pick when I knew she was on that legal team all those years ago.
Yeah I don't understand his picks, did he think they were legit? Or did he know they weren't and picked them to expose the corruption?
Military was the only way. He likely expected them to rule the way they did, or they played along. It was never meant to be solved in the courts
Keep high hopes, but we know how corrupt the courts are.
Ohhh... the same SCOUTS that threw out the appeals in December? Why should we get excited for this? They are globalist shills. If you really need some hopium there are far better sources...
"The 25th Amendment is of zero risk to me but will come back to haunt Joe Biden and the Biden Administration." -Donald J. Trump
I read, but didn’t confirm, that they decided not to hear it. Maybe some one can provide some insight.
Good. No, I didn’t hear anything in the passed couple of days. Only about a week ago that they were not going to hear a case because the ruling would be moot.
No standing! Next!
No fraud? ?
There is quite a large amount of evidence indicating fraud. Ask yourself why no-one in the system wants a court to examine it.
Note I didn't say proof, that is for the court to decide, but only if they allow a case to proceed - or are you ok with denying trials because the MSM keep telling porkies?
most of those cases were brought by private citizens, or are you still getting your 'intel' from CNN.
What about the case that Sydnell Powell brought that had 270 pages of evidence? You are trying to tell me that every page was blank?
ok, then perhaps you might try to understand why the NG are still in DC? You might also want to consider if FEMA is in charge in DC.
Do you do anything except anti-claim? I'm willing to look at evidence to the contrary, but all I'm seeing is evidence that something is afoott, and it isn't a legitimate presedential inauguration.
Man you need to turn off the TV or some shit cause you are so far off the mark
Or... John Epstein Island Roberts tells them how to vote, again? They decide the plaintiff doesn't have standing, or that the case was submitted too late to have any effect on the matter? ( There's a legal term for that, I forget what it is. laudes? laeches? ) Maybe the SC ignoring the fraud is the point when the military makes the national security call and steps in? Not sure, it doesn't seem like a big enough demonstration that everything's compromised, to me.