1384 days from now, it will be 11.4 (2024) not only does to lead to Q post 1384 which is a mindblower, and NOT ONLY is this day after election day in 2024, BUT 11.4 comes after 11.3 from the DoD Manual (Obviously). If you're up to date on info, you'd know that 11.3 is the first marker to look for. let me copy paste what section 11.4 says below This looks very much like it relates to the temporary military occupancy of DC.
11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory.92 The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory to the Occupying Power.
11.4.1 Right of the Occupying Power to Govern the Enemy Territory Temporarily. The right to govern the territory of the enemy during its military occupation is one of the incidents of war. By the fact of occupation (i.e., the Occupying Power’s established power over occupied territory),* the Occupying Power is conferred the authority to exercise some of the rights of sovereignty. The exercise of these sovereign rights also results from the necessity of maintaining law and order, indispensable both to the inhabitants and to the occupying force, and the failure or inability of the legitimate government to exercise its functions, or the undesirability of allowing it to do so.
11.4.2 Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory. Belligerent occupation in a foreign war, being based upon the possession of enemy territory, necessarily implies that the sovereignty of the occupied territory is not vested in the Occupying Power. Occupation is essentially provisional. Because sovereignty is not vested in the Occupying Power, the fact of military occupation does not authorize the Occupying Power to take certain actions. For example, the Occupying Power is not authorized by the fact of belligerent occupation to annex occupied territory or to create a new State. In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it. Similarly, in view of the provisional nature of belligerent occupation, the authority of the Occupying Power under occupation law has been interpreted as being subject to limitations on the ability of the Occupying Power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf Pompeo Tweet: https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1352274074886680579
Could the blackout at the Vatican have been a recovery mission of documents pertaining to the 1871 deal ?
Hmmm definitely possible. They supposedly have all kinds of historical records stored there.
That would be like, so hot.
do they really need that kind of proof?
The Vatican never blacked out. There are several cameras that point at the Vatican, only one camera went "dark" and its because that cameras iris closed up. I remember a thread over at TDW where a guy posted an alt cam from windy that showed this
Ah missed that. Thanks for the info.
Gunshots were heard from the area that went dark, several Vatican staff resigned the next day. The camera story is a distraction.
These videos beg to differ
https://rumble.com/vcmk2b-pope-get-arrested-blackout-something-big-in-rome..html
https://rumble.com/vcmk4j-more-clues-on-the-pope-possible-arrest.-notice-a-red-folder.html
videos of a motorcade? Big deal man.
and that second video doesn't prove a damn thing either.
Several bishops connected to the Vatican "died of COVID"
Possible hits placed?
You’re right. I bet you’re just as holy as the pope. Sorry but suck it yourself.
Also if the rumors are true about the massive hoard of wealth being extracted from the Vatican, that could potentially be funding the white hat's current operations.