I’m all for the plan, but I think adamantly making this claim as though it’s fact is harmful. Countless instances of anons coming to false conclusions, which then reflects badly on the movement.
This is a perfect space for speculation, but I feel like you need to be more careful with making bold claims.
I agree. I don't think labeling every 13 second video clip of something odd should have the word "PROOF!" As part of the title.
Just provide as much context as you can and maybe offer another mainstream source to cross reference with. I understand they are liars. So if the mainstream source either has no audio, cuts out before the aid leans in, or just cuts out that few seconds all together, then you've got no other choice but to go with what we see here.
With that being said, when I saw the "inauguration" video I noticed how large her mask was and prior to that, I noticed pelosi's mask getting larger after her 4 day absence when she made those several remark at the podium and in the chambers. Her hair is different, her body proportions are different and her mannerisms are different as seen here and the inauguration video. So I do believe what I'm seeing here to be solid evidence (not PROOF) of a stand-in.
I agree, there’s plenty to be suspicious about. Plenty to look into. The footage of the inauguration with the 2 different sets of people in the background is very interesting.
I just think it does a disservice when people claim something is irrefutable PROOF, when there are literally dozens of other possible explanations.
Listen to audio of Hunter. Then listen to this. If you disagree with my claim state why. I'm glad you're worried about optics, if you can't see, pretty much everyone hates us, and there are shills everywhere. Claiming this is Hunter Biden is peanuts to already existing posts regarding a fake white house, or Declass for bitcoin. Can't call it a false conclusion when you provide no evidence of your own. The movement will be fine regardless. If it's a perfect space for speculation, let me speculate and shut the fuck up (unless you have actual evidence). I'll post what I'd like whenever I like, thank you.
Don’t be a douche. It’s actually pretty easy to say “likely Hunter Biden speaking” instead of “Hunter Biden speaking”. If you’re not careful, you become no better than fake news
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
Oh yeah, lots going on. For sure it's something there...just not Hunter Biden beyond a shadow of a doubt/absolute fact. It might be, and it sounds like him, but it could be a lot of people. I think we agree on that.
I’m on it dawg, thanks. Your comment was just fine until the end when you became unnecessarily belligerent. Same team yo. We have to be OK with receiving criticism.
I have. Don’t be such a defensive little cunt. If you’re so confident with your claims you wouldn’t be acting so insecure and defensive.
The reason I don’t buy into statements that it’s 100% hunter is because there is not enough evidence to prove it. You haven’t provided any analysis besides you opinion - which you have to admit is inherently bias. Have you provided any profession audio analysis? Any way to distinguish Hunter from someone who sounds similar to him? Literally any solid evidence except for your own personal opinion?
Could it be hunter? Yes. Does it sound like him? Kind of similar. Do you have enough evidence to claim irrefutably that it is in fact Hunter? Not by a fucking long shot pal.
Stop being such a little fucking bitch about it and step up your analysis.
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
I agree, it is suspect. Also, I've never seen anything like that happen in all my years. I haven't watched too many political press conferences, but I've watched tons of sports press conferences and I've never seen that. I've watched a lot of speeches, and have never seen that.
Could have been an attorney or a judge. May even have been Hunter. Point is we DON'T KNOW and stating things like this with such certainly is one reason so many have earned the moniker, Qtard.
agreed. I think he says "settlement for a guy". it's not just about its reflection on the movement but we distract ourselves with it. it was absolutely worth looking into. we deboonked it together. let's move on together. we will prevail.
I’m all for the plan, but I think adamantly making this claim as though it’s fact is harmful. Countless instances of anons coming to false conclusions, which then reflects badly on the movement.
This is a perfect space for speculation, but I feel like you need to be more careful with making bold claims.
I agree. I don't think labeling every 13 second video clip of something odd should have the word "PROOF!" As part of the title.
Just provide as much context as you can and maybe offer another mainstream source to cross reference with. I understand they are liars. So if the mainstream source either has no audio, cuts out before the aid leans in, or just cuts out that few seconds all together, then you've got no other choice but to go with what we see here.
With that being said, when I saw the "inauguration" video I noticed how large her mask was and prior to that, I noticed pelosi's mask getting larger after her 4 day absence when she made those several remark at the podium and in the chambers. Her hair is different, her body proportions are different and her mannerisms are different as seen here and the inauguration video. So I do believe what I'm seeing here to be solid evidence (not PROOF) of a stand-in.
I agree, there’s plenty to be suspicious about. Plenty to look into. The footage of the inauguration with the 2 different sets of people in the background is very interesting.
I just think it does a disservice when people claim something is irrefutable PROOF, when there are literally dozens of other possible explanations.
Well said.
Listen to audio of Hunter. Then listen to this. If you disagree with my claim state why. I'm glad you're worried about optics, if you can't see, pretty much everyone hates us, and there are shills everywhere. Claiming this is Hunter Biden is peanuts to already existing posts regarding a fake white house, or Declass for bitcoin. Can't call it a false conclusion when you provide no evidence of your own. The movement will be fine regardless. If it's a perfect space for speculation, let me speculate and shut the fuck up (unless you have actual evidence). I'll post what I'd like whenever I like, thank you.
Don’t be a douche. It’s actually pretty easy to say “likely Hunter Biden speaking” instead of “Hunter Biden speaking”. If you’re not careful, you become no better than fake news
As I said above,
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
Don't lose the obvious.
Oh yeah, lots going on. For sure it's something there...just not Hunter Biden beyond a shadow of a doubt/absolute fact. It might be, and it sounds like him, but it could be a lot of people. I think we agree on that.
I’m on it dawg, thanks. Your comment was just fine until the end when you became unnecessarily belligerent. Same team yo. We have to be OK with receiving criticism.
I hear what you're saying but the burden of proof is on you.
I think it sounds like hunter biden. But I can't prove it. Need to run through a voice analyzer and we may get closer to being positive
I have. Don’t be such a defensive little cunt. If you’re so confident with your claims you wouldn’t be acting so insecure and defensive. The reason I don’t buy into statements that it’s 100% hunter is because there is not enough evidence to prove it. You haven’t provided any analysis besides you opinion - which you have to admit is inherently bias. Have you provided any profession audio analysis? Any way to distinguish Hunter from someone who sounds similar to him? Literally any solid evidence except for your own personal opinion? Could it be hunter? Yes. Does it sound like him? Kind of similar. Do you have enough evidence to claim irrefutably that it is in fact Hunter? Not by a fucking long shot pal. Stop being such a little fucking bitch about it and step up your analysis.
Omfg. Boo fucking hoo. You’re such an insufferable little bitch. You play the victim and project so hard, you could be a top mind of reddit.
So you’re saying this place isn’t for rational thinking? You give the Q movement a bad name.
Infiltration? Subversion? I see what you’re doing. Maybe some ppl fall for your shit but I see you.
SMH
He was being totally civil and cordial to you. How about YOU shut the fuck up?
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
Don't lose the obvious.
Have you ever worked in audio/visual? There are lots of legitimate explanations for why that could have happened.
Here’s a link to a thread discussing some considerations, or alternative theories. https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJt9gqgK/can-we-please-clear-up-who-was-t/
Regardless of who was speaking over Joe, it was rhen content that got me. A plea deal, really?
I agree, it is suspect. Also, I've never seen anything like that happen in all my years. I haven't watched too many political press conferences, but I've watched tons of sports press conferences and I've never seen that. I've watched a lot of speeches, and have never seen that.
Could have been an attorney or a judge. May even have been Hunter. Point is we DON'T KNOW and stating things like this with such certainly is one reason so many have earned the moniker, Qtard.
agreed. I think he says "settlement for a guy". it's not just about its reflection on the movement but we distract ourselves with it. it was absolutely worth looking into. we deboonked it together. let's move on together. we will prevail.
It is an opinion, like every one has one. If you want proof you gonna have to find some kind of voice analysis and see if it matches Hunter.