First, who the hell was that who swore Biden in? She wasn't even a member of SCOTUS, much less the Chief Justice. Does the Chief Justice usually do it just because of precedent or is there something somewhere that says he or another member of SCOTUS has to do it?
Second, regarding the rumors that the broadcast was shown a full 8 hours early in Spain (multiple reports of that so far it seems), I will say this: I was stunned when I turned on my feed to it and it wasn't yet noon and Biden was already delivering his speech post swearing in. I remember thinking at the time how odd that was that they had done it early, even if it was just by a few minutes.
Thoughts on those?
I live in Spain and have heard nothing of a broadcast being what was originally 11 hours early, and now you're saying 8 hours early. At either of those times it would've been at 7am or 10am respectively, and not a single person I talked to that day mentioned anything about an inauguration taking place earlier that day. The opposite in fact, they were talking about the inauguration that was going to be on later that day.
I don't really watch the Spanish MSM that much naturally, but the bits I do check here and there, I also saw no report of it, not that they would mention it. But I have literally only heard about it on this website. So it just seems like more gossip and hearsay to me tbh.
Thanks.
That's good to know. I wasn't clear on the hours and just threw an estimate out from memory. I just checked and the bald guy in this video below claims he received it 10 hours before it went public. Don't know if he's telling the truth or not. Start at 3:30 in. https://www.simonparkes.org/post/simon-parkes-charlie-ward-david-nino-rodriguez-tiana-islam
That's Charlie Ward. As I understand it he says that he received a link or a recording of the inauguration by mail or something, not that it was publicly broadcast. I suppose he lives in Spain, that's why he mentions the country, for people to understand which time zone 7h refers to.
I don't trust Charlie Ward, get a VERY creepy feeling from him and his nonsense about having all these "insiders" as buds but of course, can't reveal ANY of them. Do you think his being in selling gold, etc. has influenced his "salesmanship" on current events??
I believe at least part of the inauguration was prerecorded so his claim might be true. I have no idea about the veracity of Ward's and Parkes claims in general. Maybe I am naive but I think they are sincere and put out information they receive and believe is true. But that is no guarantee the information is correct so I take everything with a pinch of salt. Even if it is information that comes from white hats, it can be deliberate disinformation to throw the enemy off course. Real white hats would never put out information that can tip the deep state off, only things that are considered "harmless" or already history. That's what I think just based on logic.
Perhaps it did, I imagine if it did it would've gotten shut down very quickly. But I dunno, still feel like I would need more proof than this random bald guy talking about it.
Totally. That's why I'm hoping to crowdsource this right now.
He can have whatever kink he wants as long as his intel is true
Since every damn commneter says this, is it possible he has done anything else of worth, or is it just the meme now?? Just askin'
Yeah, to me that is a total red herring, a poisoning of the well.
Nobody should get sidetracked on that, unless, against all logic and current evidence, there is some incontrovertible proof. But I don't think there will be, because it's essentially nonsensical.
Sorry which part.
The played 10 hours early on TV in Spain and als got sent 10 hours ahead of time to some weird English conspiracy dude who didn't bother to post it everywhere, all over the internet, to instantly reveal the fraud... part.
I hear you, but I feel like if that had happened word of it would've spread around.