This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
Seriously - WTAF is up with those remarks???
Are we being misled??
I mean; there WAS serious, systemic and verifiable fraud, right???
OR is this just a case of yet MORE people with zero balls and backbone to do and say what needs to be said & done?
Yes, there is massive fraud, it just hasn't been exposed in court yet.
Right but what I mean is why did those attorneys even make statements like that at all???
Doesn't make any sense.....
His other point was that they didn’t care about getting lower court arguments thrown out in order to rush it to SC...which makes ZERO sense because SC considers what was presented at the ACTUAL CASE when deciding to take an appeal of a case or not.