Daily Discussion Thread - February 3rd, 2021
?️ DISCUSSION ?
.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (136)
sorted by:
I don't think big tech will be broken up, at least not in the sense many may think. The solution for big tech is section 230 which honestly would be quite simple regarding changes to it that would fix problems. Personally I feel FB and twitter are useless but google is very useful with the android phones, google maps, google earth satellites etc.
I will always be in favor of private business over government because private business is typically efficient while government usually fucks up at every turn, especially with wasting money. They should be protected from being liable for what people say on their platforms but they should only have policies in line with the laws in this country.
If a place like FB doesn't want to give up their power to censor people then they can forfeit their protection against being liable for every post or comment. They should have the choice to obey the laws and be in line with the constitution, such as 1st amendment.
This may also disappoint or right out piss off some people but there will be plenty of people that will not be put away in prison because with their resignations will come agreements to provide information, data, testimony, and whatever else asked of in order to arrest those at the highest levels, especially those hiding in the shadows wielding the most power.
Some of these people may not end up in prison but they will be known for what they are and will forever have a target on their back, so to speak. Many that are involved at low levels will likely not see prison but justice will still be served. Those will just crawl back under the rock which they came from, if someone doesn't murder them.
I know this would never happen because all governments are too greedy but the billions, if not trillions of dollars in money, assets etc from the elite like let's say Rockefeller, Rothschild, Soros, Clinton, Bush, and more, that wealth honestly should be take and given to the people because countless millions have suffered throughout decades while these hidden scum have gotten richer while committing endless crimes against humanity.
I never liked the concept of taking from the rich to give to the poor but ask yourself, how many poor people are only poor because of the rich?
How many people have had to suffer in life, live paycheck to paycheck while the rich spend money endlessly and freely all while much of it being illegally done?
I don't care who is running the government, do we really want all that wealth to go to the government who has proven time and time again to mismanage and waste that money?
Makes you do a second thought on black Americans calls for reparations?
I don't believe blacks in American want reparations. Any I've worked with and have known, they all wanted to work and make their own money. They didn't want anything given to them for free just because a few generations back blacks were treated poorly.
It's probably a matter of pride, any that has any pride will want to make their own money and earn what they get in life and be proud of what they have in life. Every black person has opportunity just like white people, to earn a good income.
Those calling for reparations are government and media who are pandering for votes for power and control. They pander to a group that honestly are bums, regardless of race. The bums that want free handouts instead of earning it. Little do they seem to realize that you can get way more money working than you can mooching off the government. The government won't even give enough money to live off of, more like barely surviving.
I agree.But I understand it's weaponization.Same with disparaging the military.Removing statues.Years ago,the left wanted to bury politicians in Arlington.Any weapon to bastardize conservative values.Same crap has been used for decades.Easy for them now due to media.
If I expand my thinking,
which I try to do always,
The corporations are really a single animal, operating in different sectors.
At the top of the corporate tree are the Bond Holders, who are the actual proprietors, owners.
Collectively all corporations are owned by a relatively small number of entities and people.
Basically, the Bond holders are the Khazars, those ancient bloodlines who rule over us.
So if they lose the battle for the world, as we all suspect they will,
then these corporations will be seized as forfeiture for their crimes against humanity.
The liquidators of the USA Inc will also have supervision of those assets
then people like Bezos have a change of status.
A lot of what these corporations do or provide may still be needed, eg phones, internet, vehicles, food, etc etc.
There is a need to maintain their operations and production etc
but a new ownership structure with a new public benefit charter will be needed.
The problem isn’t the corporations. Remember Occupy Wallstreet? They ‘almost’ had it right but not quite. The problem isn’t Wallstreet but the liaison between the government and Wallstreet (corporations) that creates a disadvantage for the consumer. In a true free market, the success or failure of a company depends on it’s ability to meet supply/demand. When legislation interferes with true supply/demand, we have a warped “capitalist” (which really isn’t) environment. All we need to do is take government back to a limited role to simply protect the consumer/individual and let the free market thrive.
Yes. Corporations aren’t inherently bad. But a government that allows them to violate laws and artificially suppresses competition is the cause of 99% of problems.
Absofrackinglutely!
Yup, if I remember right without reading my comment again, I don't think I mentioned any of the owners or ceos of those companies. I don't care if those people are removed, put in prison or whatever but the companies have decades of infrastructure that is extremely useful.
I don't like the idea of someone's company being taken from them but at least 1 of them is highly suspected to have been given to its ceo through the cia but regardless, when they went as far as to censor and ban a sitting president, well isn't that almost kinda like treason?