https://qanon.pub/?q=Qanon#4881
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
Thank you.. this helps.. a sort of FFIR for those of us still climbing on board.. while I'm here.. is x22 legit? Or deception by the qanon?
X22 is pretty legit. Never seen anybody have any real criticisms of him and I watch him every day and haven't heard him say anything off, nor does he just go along with any ol' "hype" that goes around; he stays grounded.
TYS!
he says the same thing in every video and basically just copies what he sees on this board. He even had a whole video which was reading a long post on here word for word.
He seems to get good intel, but people who monetize always make me a little suspicious. That he is even able to get sponsors in this climate is a little irksome to me.
I'd look to him for a hit of good news and happenings, but don't rely on him solely.
I understand... but with the mass DEMONITIZATION.. I cant fault him for doing that... you cant do this stuff for free(?)