As far as I'm aware, any AF plane carrying POTUS can have the callsign AF1.
It's not restricted to any one plane.
One interesting point to note was that when uncle Joe flew to Delaware, that plane did not squawk as AF1.
Do you also not find it interesting that after many people pointed out the fact that he had not yet flown AF1, that they make a drama and a point of this?
For that short trip he could easily have flown in Marine 1, it would have been quicker than flying to Andrews first.
I was thinking the same thing! Every time we make any sort of comment that Biden isn’t doing this or that.. all of sudden, they toss out some massive story .. just like the Oval Office tour and following discussion.. it’s so phony.. why does he neeed to take a massive jet to fly to Delaware? Mr Green New Deal... just burning through that fossil fuel.
As an outside observer, I would be careful with lines of logic like this. While on the surface it may make sense, when viewed as if/then statements, they create paradoxical logic failures.
"If Biden does not have access to Air Force One, then he is not President."
"If Biden is shown accessing Air Force One, then it is a fake production and he is not President."
You need to find evidence that the event is fake. Not merely state it is because it disproves the first if/then statement.
Any other thought format creates a confirmation bias, and an inescapable logical fallacy.
Currently, the belief is that Biden did not have access to Air Force One. Recently he used it. They showed him using it because all Presidents are shown leaving and arriving on Air Force One. It is the common action when the President departs.
Disprove it was actually Air Force One, do not get trapped in the idea that presentation of proof is proof of the lie.
Even video proof doesn't matter anymore show them a video of somebody stealing the election in the FBI I'll tell you that you can't really say what's in the video because it ended too early or started too late
Afaik there is a new AF1 in production but not in service but the difference between those two planes is obvious and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that some idiots with more money than sense paid to have a domestic plane wrapped as af1 because the sheep are all idiots and won’t know the difference and their presstitute media won’t ask any questions. I’d be interested to hear a plane fag opinion on the differences between the two types of plane because the bottom one is way smaller than AF1 and I don’t think the new one is finished yet
As far as I'm aware, any AF plane carrying POTUS can have the callsign AF1. It's not restricted to any one plane. One interesting point to note was that when uncle Joe flew to Delaware, that plane did not squawk as AF1. Do you also not find it interesting that after many people pointed out the fact that he had not yet flown AF1, that they make a drama and a point of this? For that short trip he could easily have flown in Marine 1, it would have been quicker than flying to Andrews first.
I was thinking the same thing! Every time we make any sort of comment that Biden isn’t doing this or that.. all of sudden, they toss out some massive story .. just like the Oval Office tour and following discussion.. it’s so phony.. why does he neeed to take a massive jet to fly to Delaware? Mr Green New Deal... just burning through that fossil fuel.
As an outside observer, I would be careful with lines of logic like this. While on the surface it may make sense, when viewed as if/then statements, they create paradoxical logic failures.
"If Biden does not have access to Air Force One, then he is not President."
"If Biden is shown accessing Air Force One, then it is a fake production and he is not President."
You need to find evidence that the event is fake. Not merely state it is because it disproves the first if/then statement.
Any other thought format creates a confirmation bias, and an inescapable logical fallacy.
Currently, the belief is that Biden did not have access to Air Force One. Recently he used it. They showed him using it because all Presidents are shown leaving and arriving on Air Force One. It is the common action when the President departs.
Disprove it was actually Air Force One, do not get trapped in the idea that presentation of proof is proof of the lie.
Even video proof doesn't matter anymore show them a video of somebody stealing the election in the FBI I'll tell you that you can't really say what's in the video because it ended too early or started too late
Afaik there is a new AF1 in production but not in service but the difference between those two planes is obvious and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that some idiots with more money than sense paid to have a domestic plane wrapped as af1 because the sheep are all idiots and won’t know the difference and their presstitute media won’t ask any questions. I’d be interested to hear a plane fag opinion on the differences between the two types of plane because the bottom one is way smaller than AF1 and I don’t think the new one is finished yet
No use of AF1 call sign. End of story. Trackable.
Well what is the picture about. The planes look different to me.
The 747 (top) is too big to land at Delaware, so the 757 (bottom) usually used by VPotUS as AF2 can be used by PotUS as AF1.
(Also bear in mind the comments about its Air Traffic Control call sign)