This was on 8kun last night:
https://qposts.online/post/1835
1835 10-Aug-2018 2:24:24 PM EDT 8ch/patriotsfight We are under HEAVY attack. AB[C] took control. Tripcode compromised. No. 131 Last. TRIP UPDATE COMING. Q
Anon said: "There's almost 5000(*) posts. 1835 says some were compd and 131 was the last real Q post until 1835 when they fixed the trip code.
It just so happens, all the stuff like zero risk of impeachment and trust sessions and all the wrong stuff is in the posts Q said were compd.
That leaves over 3000 non-compd posts which don't have the wrong stuff
(*) the number is specific."
Me: At the time it happened I thought Q was just referring to the one post when the trip got compromised...but the anon in the paste above thinks posts 132-1835 were ab(c) compromised. and what they wrote above is an interesting argument looking back.
If true, did Q let them do this or did they have a sleeper in their ranks and we would need to comb through those 132-1834 posts to see what should be thrown out or it just couldn't be possible and the anon is wrong??
This is why I don't like this site. Too many stupid people who don't do their research and instead spread nonsensical misinformation. When Q wrote "no. 131 last" that was in reference to the post number on the private qresearch board. This was back in the 8chan days before the site was shut down. There was a separate board that only Q could respond to and no one else. Q would leave drops there every now and then, 131 at the time. You can even see this for yourself if you go on the qagg.news website. If you look at Q post 1846 it tells you "Direct Link: 2556723" the posts with the long numbers are the public posts that everyone can respond to. If you look at Q post 1835 which is the post you're referencing, it tells you "Direct Link: 132" because Q wrote that in the board that only he writes in. It's different now on 8kun. Q used to write posts in two different boards on 8chan.
Whoever downvoted me, I'll dumb this down even further so that even toddlers (and you) can understand.
Q started out posting on 4chan in 2017. Then moved over to 8chan as 4chan was comped.
Q posted in something called 'breads' on one of the 8chan boards that people would create and respond to. These were places with public posts. The post numbers in this board were in the 7-8+ digits as so many people created posts there.
Someone on 8chan then decided to create a separate board specifically for Q to post in whenever he felt like it. It was called qresearch or qpatriots, I forget the exact name. Only Q could post in it, no one else. It was there for other anons to merely read. Q mostly posted in the public board, sometimes even do Q&A sessions. But every now and then they did drop a post in their private board. I forget the exact number but it was a few hundred over the course of 8chan's existence.
Then 8chan was shut down and 8kun took its place, and Q started posting there. But nonetheless, all Q posts have been archived on many archive sites.
This theory the OP purported is dumb and whoever created it wants to misdirect people and steer their attention away. Q post 1834, which is supposedly one of the 'comped' ones according to OP's theory, has a direct link to 131, which puts this nonsensical theory to rest. Those posts are no longer available as they were on 8chan before the site was deleted, but nonetheless, all Q posts have been archived on many archive sites like qagg.news. You can see this for yourself. Qpost1830 direct link 128, Qpost1831 direct link 129, Qpost1832 direct link 2538955, Qpost1833 direct link 130, Qpost1834 direct link 131, Qpost1835 direct link 132, Qpost1836 direct link 133, Qpost1837 direct link 134. In other words, Qpost1832 is the 2538955th post on that particular 8chan board. Qpost1834 is the 131st post on that particular 8chan board.
Anyone who used 8chan at the time can verify this. Everyone knows Q posted on two different boards. This is even ignoring the very simple and very obvious fact that if there were any posts that Q didn't write, then they wouldn't be archived, plain and simple. Only verified posts get archived on the archive sites. Q made sure of that.
Makes sense now?
I don't think anyone is downvoting your information, just your approach to informing. There is no reason to treat people who do not know something as stupid. There is a huge difference between ignorance and stupidity. Every single person is ignorant of something or other. There was a time when even you were ignorant of the topics you are sharing with us now.
It is the job of those of us that study Q to help inform those who are waking up and are ignorant. I do appreciate the information you have shared. A little patience and kindness in your explanation (or even just an absence of meanness) probably wouldn't kill you (I don't think).
True, but I'm an asshole. It's just in my nature. The point is the information is still shared, and posts like these do need to be exposed because I see so many people now questioning Q posts. Disinfo like this is harmful.
Disinfo is harmful. Your exposition is helpful. But not all disinfo is intentional or malicious.
People are waking up in droves. Many will find their way here. Our job is to inform them and encourage their future learning, so they can help others as they wake up.
Its not called "The Great Awakening" because you are no longer sleeping, it got that name because its going to be everyone, each in their own time and by their own meandering path. The best thing we can do for them, and for all others that follow them, is not discourage but guide them.
I call bs, this is really a weak attempt at pitching anon’s against each other. Q would let us know of every typo, I think Q would also let us know if any posts were compromised.
Exactly. OP is the one spreading disinfo. Probably a C_A shill.
Not trying to pitch anyone against anyone. I want to test the validity of the anons claim. Post 1835 from Q says post 131 was the last. So if they aren't compromised then what was the theory for what 131 was the last meant?
I was curious as it was a valid take to explore. Not saying I agree or disagree with it.
Does it not bother anyone that if you think for yourself and post asking for a discussion and it doesn’t make sense to someone who “knows” more you get called names?! Exactly the opposite of this movement as I understand it! The movement is to think for YOURSELF not blindly trust someone who has more followers interpretation! It’s also to QUESTION EVERYTHING. But on this site you’re not allowed to have different opinions or you’re called stupid!
zero risk of impeachment - does not mean that he would not be charged
if he is not the President? they cannot impeach him (Zero Risk)
That's what I think. I mean, Trump even used those exact words in the border wall (I think) speech.
I agree.
It's worth digging into.
But maybe misdirection too.
They reposted because the original post title and 8kun link were confusing people on who the source was. Let's discuss the topic itself.