Do you know WHY people use offensive words? Because it's a canary for freedom of speech. And now you've just killed it. We should have realized it all along that there wasn't ever going to be a commitment to the First Amendment. All these overtures against racism were left wing sleeper attacks on freedom. They always have been and always will be. But you just let them win.
To paraphrase Martin Niemoheller's poem: First they came for the "N-word", and I did not speak out—because I was not a "white nationalist."
What will be next? Banning people who were "patriots" because they "stormed the capital" and the media claims they're "violent?" Banning people who think there was "election fraud" because "Biden/Harris are the POTUS" because it's "harmful to our democracy?" Banning people who "follow QAnon" because the FBI claims it's "domestic terrorism?"
You're going to let the MSM and Deep State win this at this rate. It's the same tactic as "common sense gun control." It shuts down your critical thinking because you've been oversensitized to "mean words" and "scary things." It's fear mongering. But for some reason the "reeeecism" card seems to work on conservatives, too. When does this nonsense end and we stop vilifying and banishing words that some people don't like end?
Leftists will never be satisfied with anything you give them. Pearl clutchers ALWAYS lose in a game of information warfare. You do not fold on your commitment to freedom because someone may say something ugly. This is why agreeableness is such a negative psychological trait. It's what makes normies so normie. The empathy button is like a big red switch to shut down critical thinking and undermine commitment to freedom. One cry-bully whinebag complains about a "mean word" and you just fucking surrender like they're your new master. You've seen where these tactics go. You've seen it play out hundreds of times on every social media platform. THE PLAYBOOK IS ALWAYS THE SAME. STOP FALLING FOR IT.
The mods might as well go fly your CCP flag in their back yard like Mitch McConnell and Mittens. They're surrendering without firing a shot.
Way to confirm my point. We wouldn't want to be caught "exercising freedom of speech" around these parts, would we? Gotta regulate that shit, am I right?
See, here's the part you don't seem to have picked up. I'm merely a gadfly speaking truth to what I see. I don't care about this word you're having an allergic attack over. It's 6 letters. It's only a problem if you choose to make it a problem.
You're the ones choosing to make this into a form of tyranny. It's another repetition of a cycle I've seen far too often. Petty tyrant mods who choose to shut down the speech of their forum and slowly kill it off in the process.
Choose this day whom you will serve: Freedom or tyranny.
I find faggot inflammatory when are you going to ban that? I also find Q tard inflammatory when are you going to ban that? I also find rigger and jogger inflammatory when are you going to ban that?
Inflammatory? As stated, I am a gadfly speaking truth. The truth is the truth. The only one who finds the truth inflammatory is a tyrant. For truth is treason in a kingdom of lies.
I have not imposed any standard of any kind upon you. I simply state what I see. You are always free to decide what you find "decent" or "indecent" and what you choose to peruse.
However, freedom is not practiced when one imposes their standards of "decency" on other people without consent. Freedom is a choice that belongs to the individual. And I do not consent to censorship. The only usage of a code of conduct is as a cover for censorship using your standard of "decency" as a pretextual justification.
Do you know WHY people use offensive words? Because it's a canary for freedom of speech. And now you've just killed it. We should have realized it all along that there wasn't ever going to be a commitment to the First Amendment. All these overtures against racism were left wing sleeper attacks on freedom. They always have been and always will be. But you just let them win.
To paraphrase Martin Niemoheller's poem: First they came for the "N-word", and I did not speak out—because I was not a "white nationalist."
What will be next? Banning people who were "patriots" because they "stormed the capital" and the media claims they're "violent?" Banning people who think there was "election fraud" because "Biden/Harris are the POTUS" because it's "harmful to our democracy?" Banning people who "follow QAnon" because the FBI claims it's "domestic terrorism?"
You're going to let the MSM and Deep State win this at this rate. It's the same tactic as "common sense gun control." It shuts down your critical thinking because you've been oversensitized to "mean words" and "scary things." It's fear mongering. But for some reason the "reeeecism" card seems to work on conservatives, too. When does this nonsense end and we stop vilifying and banishing words that some people don't like end?
Leftists will never be satisfied with anything you give them. Pearl clutchers ALWAYS lose in a game of information warfare. You do not fold on your commitment to freedom because someone may say something ugly. This is why agreeableness is such a negative psychological trait. It's what makes normies so normie. The empathy button is like a big red switch to shut down critical thinking and undermine commitment to freedom. One cry-bully whinebag complains about a "mean word" and you just fucking surrender like they're your new master. You've seen where these tactics go. You've seen it play out hundreds of times on every social media platform. THE PLAYBOOK IS ALWAYS THE SAME. STOP FALLING FOR IT.
The mods might as well go fly your CCP flag in their back yard like Mitch McConnell and Mittens. They're surrendering without firing a shot.
Great post and spot on friend.
You for president
Way to confirm my point. We wouldn't want to be caught "exercising freedom of speech" around these parts, would we? Gotta regulate that shit, am I right?
See, here's the part you don't seem to have picked up. I'm merely a gadfly speaking truth to what I see. I don't care about this word you're having an allergic attack over. It's 6 letters. It's only a problem if you choose to make it a problem.
You're the ones choosing to make this into a form of tyranny. It's another repetition of a cycle I've seen far too often. Petty tyrant mods who choose to shut down the speech of their forum and slowly kill it off in the process.
Choose this day whom you will serve: Freedom or tyranny.
Can we vote out LurkerWill?
I don't recall voting for this. They must have hired Dominion Voting Systems.
I find faggot inflammatory when are you going to ban that? I also find Q tard inflammatory when are you going to ban that? I also find rigger and jogger inflammatory when are you going to ban that?
Inflammatory? As stated, I am a gadfly speaking truth. The truth is the truth. The only one who finds the truth inflammatory is a tyrant. For truth is treason in a kingdom of lies.
I have not imposed any standard of any kind upon you. I simply state what I see. You are always free to decide what you find "decent" or "indecent" and what you choose to peruse.
However, freedom is not practiced when one imposes their standards of "decency" on other people without consent. Freedom is a choice that belongs to the individual. And I do not consent to censorship. The only usage of a code of conduct is as a cover for censorship using your standard of "decency" as a pretextual justification.
You literally didn't refute a single point he made. I'd recommend dropping the fallaciousness.
A 33 day old account shouldn't be calling out other, slightly newer accounts.
So calling people faggots is civil?
You literally called people retards in your initial post. Don't be a hypocrite.
This dude is definitely a shill. We've been cointelpro-ed.