WHY NO ONE SHOULD BE WATCHING NEWSMAX ... 2015 Breitbart Report: NEWSMAX CEO Donates $1 Million to Clinton Foundation
(www.breitbart.com)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
It was a total give-away to anyone awake that Newsmax is being molded to be the next Fox News.
I’ve concluded since then most likely all cable news networks are controlled in some manner or another.
The perceived “competitors” is just fiction to make people think the news sources are not all controlled.
I’ve read recently that China censored BBC. Total farce since China owns BBC.
It’s just one big fictional movie.
Take a look at the at the NASA Fly-by image of Pluto here (This is from 07/14/2015
https://skyweek.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/original.jpg?w=450&h=473
Then take a look at the raw images from same day
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/soc/Pluto-Encounter/index.php?order=downlinkDate&page=2/
Either I'm missing something, the science is mostly bullshit.
I just cranked up ustvgo.tv This is the best free to site I have seen, but I'm telling you bnow, TV is FUBAR.
I click on NatGeo, here are some photogenic so called scientist pontificating about life in our solar system. A scientific team of hyperventilating gungleheads is proclaiming that life almost certainly exist beneath in the 100 mile deep liquid layer beneath Europa's, Jupiter largest moon, Sulphur crust. They show the outer planets and moons are though they are the actual close up images taken by a visiting spacecraft. It's total fantasy hyped up by the scientist in order to get funding dollars. You and I know this, right?
Then I turn to the science channel, and they taking about the Newgrange archaeological site in Ireland. The drone flies over the symmetrical mound ringed by a gleaming quartz wall, and the narrator speaks words of wonder at the precise cut of the stones, and marvels are how prehistoric builders could have achieved such precision.
They only show the site as it exist today, after the entire mound, wall and all was removed, and reconstructed in the 60's and 70's, leading one to believe that this was the way it looked back in the day. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. I don't believe a damn thing scientist have to say. The have sold their integrity and sole to the highest bidder, same goes for people in the medical field, as far as I'm concerned.
Take a look at the top photo at this link, this is what they are showing. Then look at the other photos that show the site at different points in time. To me, the entire thing look like a big mound of dirt.
http://irisharchaeology.ie/2012/12/images-of-newgrange-through-the-ages/