1
JMED1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed, fren. We ask, dig, vet and investigate ... "Ms. Barnette, who ran for the House in 2020 in a Philadelphia suburb and lost by nearly 20 percentage points, had rated somewhere between afterthought and asterisk in the race until recently. But a Fox News poll on Tuesday showed the race a virtual three-way tie." - NYT

2
JMED1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was who she was supporting and details out in her 2020 book Bush, Rubio and Christie? And then says "She was never a Trumper" ... Who is rallying around her now? IMO hard pass, but that's just me.

"Ms. Barnette, who ran for the House in 2020 in a Philadelphia suburb and lost by nearly 20 percentage points, had rated somewhere between afterthought and asterisk in the race until recently. But a Fox News poll on Tuesday showed the race a virtual three-way tie." - NYT

I just find it interesting how CNN, NYT, Philadelphia Inquirer are very kind and soft spoken about her. How do you lost a suburb by 20 points and then run for one the highest offices in the state ... I just think, it calls for investigation.

1
JMED1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

McCormick ... its just such an important office -- and we can't forget they want us divided.

0
JMED1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

"In her book, published in February 2020, Barnette even says Trump was last on her pick list in the 2016 GOP primary – meaning she liked former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Ohio Gov. John Kasich More.

“In all honesty, I wasn’t a Trumper to begin with,” Barnette wrote on page 33 of his book. “With the likes of former Governor Mike Huckabee, neurosurgeon Ben Carson and Senator Ted Cruz, there was no way on God’s Green Earth that I intended to vote for the TV mogul. and business. We simply had too many “good” options to vote for him. Out of sixteen presidential candidates, Donald Trump was number 16 on my favorite list.

As of the publication of this article, Barnette still has all of these tweets posted on her Twitter feed.

After a September 2015 debate, for example, Barnette said Trump “was awful.”

She also said in another tweet on September 26, 2015 that Trump would be “good 4 beers and BBQ”.

“BUT, not as president,” Barnette said of Trump, adding that “WE are so morally bankrupt” for even considering Trump.

Barnette also that day, when Barack Obama was still president, called Trump “JUST AS LIBERAL” as the “leaders we have now.” [have in] Office.”

She also said in another tweet that while she loves Trump, “he’s nothing more than HEADLINES” and with Trump there’s “very little substance.”

She also said that Trump’s “moral character is questionable” and that he is “boastful.”

When Dr. Ben Carson endorsed Trump in March 2016, Barnette tweeted that “there’s a real disconnect, for me” in Carson endorsing Trump over Cruz."

https://goodwordnews.com/kathy-barnette-attacked-trump-in-2016-gop-primary-horrible/

1
JMED1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed ... however, a book in 2020 detailing it all out? Keeping the tweets up? She lost her last race by 20 points and now is running for senate? It all seems very calculated. She supported all of the RINOS and then in her 2020 book still holds that ,"We simply had too many “good” options to vote for him. Out of sixteen presidential candidates, Donald Trump was number 16 on my favorite list." Sorry, IMO hard pass on her.

0
JMED1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

I just trust DJT and then today I read possibly why ... she's a RINO if these are the statements from her 2020 book!

"Barnette still has all of these tweets posted on her Twitter feed.

In her book, published in February 2020, Barnette even says Trump was last on her pick list in the 2016 GOP primary – meaning she liked former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Ohio Gov. John Kasich More.

We simply had too many “good” options to vote for him. Out of sixteen presidential candidates, Donald Trump was number 16 on my favorite list."

1
JMED1776 1 point ago +2 / -1

https://goodwordnews.com/kathy-barnette-attacked-trump-in-2016-gop-primary-horrible/

I just trust DJT and then today I read possibly why ... she's a RINO if these are the statements from her 2020 book!

In her book, published in February 2020, Barnette even says Trump was last on her pick list in the 2016 GOP primary – meaning she liked former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Ohio Gov. John Kasich More.

We simply had too many “good” options to vote for him. Out of sixteen presidential candidates, Donald Trump was number 16 on my favorite list."

5
JMED1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://goodwordnews.com/kathy-barnette-attacked-trump-in-2016-gop-primary-horrible/

I just trust DJT and then today I read possibly why ... she's a RINO if these are the statements from her 2020 book!

"As of the publication of this article, Barnette still has all of these tweets posted on her Twitter feed.

In her book, published in February 2020, Barnette even says Trump was last on her pick list in the 2016 GOP primary – meaning she liked former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Ohio Gov. John Kasich More.

We simply had too many “good” options to vote for him. Out of sixteen presidential candidates, Donald Trump was number 16 on my favorite list."

5
JMED1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anything about Doug Mastriano for PA Governor?

2
JMED1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's been watching too much Handmaid's Tale.

1
JMED1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is great for some who are new anons. A change in how to think or what to consider is truly valid. Thank you for posting this ... If someone isn't interested they don't gave to read :)

1
JMED1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

EXCELLENT! I was just listening to that episode of Elijah Streams when I saw this!

4
JMED1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

"After President Trump released multiple statements on the revelations, including one pointedly calling out the mainstream media for ignoring more negative allegations against Hillary's campaign, The New York Times finally got around to writing a story days after the news broke, running online on Monday and in Tuesday's print edition.

So what was The Times' excuse? The revelations, according to national security and legal policy correspondent Charlie Savage, "tend to involve dense and obscure issues, so dissecting them requires asking readers to expend significant mental energy and time."

So because readers might need to think about what they're consuming from a news outlet rather than just uncritically accepting what an outlet tells them at face value, according to Savage, means "raising the question of whether news outlets should even cover such claims."

Except The New York Times has covered multiple other "developments" in the Durham investigation, of course in stories that undermine the Durham probe. So much for "All the News That's Fit to Print," I guess. And so much for treating readers and subscribers like intelligent people who can read a story and decide for themselves what it means."

4
JMED1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The Russian Ministry of Defense published on Tuesday what it said is fresh footage of Russian tanks and other heavy weapons being loaded to return to Russia from neighboring Belarus, via Russia Today.

Russian Defence Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov announced on Tuesday that military units have already been relocated away from the border with Ukraine."

1
JMED1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was from Telegram and they are on Gettr also.

view more: Next ›