Otherwise, I predict that he will obstruct and delay everything he can, every way he can... if he doesn't then all the FISA abuse he did that the whistleblower guy was talking about gets dumped right on his head... at which point he will go directly to Gitmo, not passing Go and not collecting $200... (which would be wonderful, btw).
Good point. Suppose you are, in principle, being blackmailed by Badguy A and Badguy B, with corresponding inculpating information A1 and B1. Is A1 = B1? If A1 > B1, then Badguy A has the upper hand. So, what does A know about B1, and B about A1? Or, it becomes an issue of how much mercy one can plead from A or B. In any case, the SC justice is going into meltdown.
I am mindful of Trump's principle of always being ready to walk away from a deal. In this case, it might morph into always being ready to pull the trigger. Could be a good object lesson for the next prospect.
At gunpoint, maybe.
Otherwise, I predict that he will obstruct and delay everything he can, every way he can... if he doesn't then all the FISA abuse he did that the whistleblower guy was talking about gets dumped right on his head... at which point he will go directly to Gitmo, not passing Go and not collecting $200... (which would be wonderful, btw).
The cabal already has him at gun point
What a miserable life these people lead!
They sell out for fame or money but you can't take it with you.
And you can't enjoy it on earth when you know how someone from the cabal is always watching you.
Set one foot in the wrong direction and someone is beating down your door.
Or blowing you up.
Or killing your loved ones.
Correct. There is no mechanism in the system (afaik) for forcing a Supreme Court justice to recuse himself.
This is true, outside impeachment.
Threat of exposure of blackmail information. So it's not "in the system." So shoot me.
Sure, except what happens when both sides have that info that they try to use against you?
But if you threaten them, they often have ways of coming after you, too (See the GA Bar and Wood).
Good point. Suppose you are, in principle, being blackmailed by Badguy A and Badguy B, with corresponding inculpating information A1 and B1. Is A1 = B1? If A1 > B1, then Badguy A has the upper hand. So, what does A know about B1, and B about A1? Or, it becomes an issue of how much mercy one can plead from A or B. In any case, the SC justice is going into meltdown.
I am mindful of Trump's principle of always being ready to walk away from a deal. In this case, it might morph into always being ready to pull the trigger. Could be a good object lesson for the next prospect.