JHTJ is with Lin Wood, he's an ex-spook who says he was tortured, and he knows about the aliens, and the quantum-time stuff, and he found God of course, and....
Gives meaning to FISA brings down the house. The thread from June 29, 2020 is interesting also. He talks about there being recordings of Roberts discussing, suggesting, negotiating, and approving the replacement for Scalia before his death. He says they all wore wires on each other and recorded all of the conversations as insurance policies since it was all very illegal.
I’m not an atty, but I believe the justices meet to discuss the cases and decide whether to hear the case. I believe 4 of them have to vote to move forward with hearing it. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will chime in ?
This is correct. And while John means well, none of these discussions will be “on the record.” The only thing we’ll learn is whether or not the Court will hear the case, and maybe a short dissenting opinion if 1-3 justices think the Court should hear it but the others do not.
Unlikely they’ll make an exception to expedite here. They’ve given the case so far a normal (slow) briefing schedule. If they wanted to expedite, they would have done so already.
And just a small correction, not a trial. These cases are on appeal. SCOTUS doesn’t hear trials, they hear appeals, which means only the limited issues raised in the parties’ briefs. There are no witnesses and no evidence, only the justices asking questions of the lawyers.
Otherwise, I predict that he will obstruct and delay everything he can, every way he can... if he doesn't then all the FISA abuse he did that the whistleblower guy was talking about gets dumped right on his head... at which point he will go directly to Gitmo, not passing Go and not collecting $200... (which would be wonderful, btw).
Good point. Suppose you are, in principle, being blackmailed by Badguy A and Badguy B, with corresponding inculpating information A1 and B1. Is A1 = B1? If A1 > B1, then Badguy A has the upper hand. So, what does A know about B1, and B about A1? Or, it becomes an issue of how much mercy one can plead from A or B. In any case, the SC justice is going into meltdown.
I am mindful of Trump's principle of always being ready to walk away from a deal. In this case, it might morph into always being ready to pull the trigger. Could be a good object lesson for the next prospect.
Now I get it. If the GA Bar disbars Lin Wood how can he go before the SCOTUS and tell the world the truth? Wow. They must really be worried about what these people are going to say at SCOTUS.
Scotus will not “hear” the case on the 19th. They will be reviewing to decide if they will take the case. The most we can hope for is that they agree to the case and even then this will probably be a year before it’s actually heard.
I have not seen that. I thought that was a different guy who was talking about Project Looking Glass. Bill Wood I think? If you have a link with Johnheretohelp discussing it, you should send me it.
this is the video in which he lost me. He's totally a demoralization agent. He gets to the end and says we're all fucked as they have the voice of god and essentially we should just give up.
Lol nah. Also if they need to keep him around to continue decoding things he should just remove himself from the board.
I saw the video with Clapper speaking. Same voice. Same story. Same words. And the blurred version does look like a bald man. Though not sure what to think about it since Clapper has knowingly lied, and more recently continued the lie about Russian interference. Playing both sides? The non-blurred video was posted on Telegram about a week ago, but cannot remember which account.
There's nothing scheduled for SCOTUS on Feb 19 according to their website. There's nothing until Feb 22, but I don't see anything related to election fraud.
All that comes out of the 19th is a yes or a no. If it’s a yes, then there will be a date for oral arguments. Then Court will hand down a decision some time after that. Could be October, could be a little earlier, but probably not much.
People keep asking if this case would be expedited, but you have to understand that from the Court’s position there would be no reason to do so, even if they decide to hear any of the cases. They DID expedite the Texas case, remember?
This is the conference where the justices discuss whether or not to take the case. It is not the on the record and no evidence will be presented. Best case scenario is the court decides to hear the case, with a hearing scheduled at some points several months from now. Worst case is we get a one sentence statement saying the court will not hear these cases.
I read somewhere that the cases Would not be “debated” until October even though they are scheduled for February 19th. Is this true? October is way too far away.
It all depends on the hearing schedule of the court. The next available time for oral argument, as it currently stands, would be for October (if that’s true).
Been trying to share this whistleblowers intel for weeks, but so few people seem to want to look at it. This is the stuff that Lin Wood based his incredible claims on.
Lin said on Parler, that Jhtp was the same as Ryan Dark White and made a dark to light reference. Clearly, head not using his real name, and is most likely under protection.
I want the evidence, they say. He says he has them on tape plotting to kill judges and the rest of it, but that's not enough unless we get to see it before a jury/tribunal does. Not how the world works, but ok.
Er wut? Can SCOTUS rule itself out in a conflict of interest? I mean, SCOTUS IS one of the ultimate expressions of the DS and professional class right?
John is definitely legit. This guy had real info that came to pass on his twitter multiple times. He is what all the LARPs like Parkes and Ward wish they were.
Does anyone have a link to the full video of the whistleblower?
I'm not going to lie, I listened to a little and kept hearing "I think.." and other speculators words and made less interested. But I didn't know the whistleblower was John here to help. I would like to listen with more engagement.
2843
Feb 20, 2019 9:57:03 PM EST
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
>>5294864 (/pb)
But, you knew that already.
Hence why [AS][SDNY][MW] are attempting to keep the ‘insurance’ scheme ongoing post Mueller.
FEAR.
The fun begins directly after.
Will make the Super Bowl look like a PUPPY SHOW.
Q
I expect the DS to keep deep stating, and Trump to keep "trumping" the competition.
Now it's Powell's turn to knock a few out of the park.
Next up after her is L. Lin Wood.
Should be an interesting couple of weeks!!!!!
Got popcorn, everyone!!!
I’m sure scotus will be super interesting in speaking with Wood, who called for Roberts and Breyer to resign.
JHTJ is with Lin Wood, he's an ex-spook who says he was tortured, and he knows about the aliens, and the quantum-time stuff, and he found God of course, and....
....sigh.
There's just way too much of this in one package.
https://archive.is/OUXq5
https://archive.is/2MhEs
Gives meaning to FISA brings down the house. The thread from June 29, 2020 is interesting also. He talks about there being recordings of Roberts discussing, suggesting, negotiating, and approving the replacement for Scalia before his death. He says they all wore wires on each other and recorded all of the conversations as insurance policies since it was all very illegal.
Upcoming SCOTUS cases: 2/19 Conference
MI- https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html (Powell)
GA- https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-799.html (Wood)
PA- https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-845.html (Trump)
WI- https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-882.html (Trump)
2/26 Conference
WI - https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-859.html (Powell)
AZ- https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-858.html (Powell)
The more constitutional SC judges were assigned to key states too
What is the meaning on “conference” in regards to SCOTUS? What should we be expecting to happen after the conference?
I’m not an atty, but I believe the justices meet to discuss the cases and decide whether to hear the case. I believe 4 of them have to vote to move forward with hearing it. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will chime in ?
This is correct. And while John means well, none of these discussions will be “on the record.” The only thing we’ll learn is whether or not the Court will hear the case, and maybe a short dissenting opinion if 1-3 justices think the Court should hear it but the others do not.
I think they decide whether to hear the case. Like a grand jury.
However, I believe they don't hear or rule on those case till October. Maybe they'll make an exception since this case is, you know, time sensitive.
This is my understanding, I might be wrong.
Unlikely they’ll make an exception to expedite here. They’ve given the case so far a normal (slow) briefing schedule. If they wanted to expedite, they would have done so already.
That's what I expect too but I hope I'm wrong. I've been wrong before.
OCTOBER?!!!! Oye vey.
Thank You!
Why do all the big events happen on Fridays..I am always working on Fridays!,
Because most people don't watch the news on the weekend. It's the best time for a story if you want it to get lost.
Read johnheretohelp’s tweet from July saying how dems and media would declare Biden won:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1285607581315215363.html
And just a small correction, not a trial. These cases are on appeal. SCOTUS doesn’t hear trials, they hear appeals, which means only the limited issues raised in the parties’ briefs. There are no witnesses and no evidence, only the justices asking questions of the lawyers.
he's a disinfo agent. Listen to his voice of god interview on bitchute, he is inconsistent and basically says we are all fucked and to just give up
Oh you with your facts and knowledge
He will be forced to recuse, COI
At gunpoint, maybe.
Otherwise, I predict that he will obstruct and delay everything he can, every way he can... if he doesn't then all the FISA abuse he did that the whistleblower guy was talking about gets dumped right on his head... at which point he will go directly to Gitmo, not passing Go and not collecting $200... (which would be wonderful, btw).
The cabal already has him at gun point
What a miserable life these people lead!
They sell out for fame or money but you can't take it with you.
And you can't enjoy it on earth when you know how someone from the cabal is always watching you.
Set one foot in the wrong direction and someone is beating down your door.
Or blowing you up.
Or killing your loved ones.
Correct. There is no mechanism in the system (afaik) for forcing a Supreme Court justice to recuse himself.
This is true, outside impeachment.
Threat of exposure of blackmail information. So it's not "in the system." So shoot me.
Sure, except what happens when both sides have that info that they try to use against you?
But if you threaten them, they often have ways of coming after you, too (See the GA Bar and Wood).
Good point. Suppose you are, in principle, being blackmailed by Badguy A and Badguy B, with corresponding inculpating information A1 and B1. Is A1 = B1? If A1 > B1, then Badguy A has the upper hand. So, what does A know about B1, and B about A1? Or, it becomes an issue of how much mercy one can plead from A or B. In any case, the SC justice is going into meltdown.
I am mindful of Trump's principle of always being ready to walk away from a deal. In this case, it might morph into always being ready to pull the trigger. Could be a good object lesson for the next prospect.
PEOPLE ARE RIOTING IN THE STREETS!!!!!!
Where?
I think that was the last message before the zombies overran him.
Source?
Right
Is this the start of FISAGATE?
Bring it, JHTH! You’re a Patriot and truth-teller! ??????
Now I get it. If the GA Bar disbars Lin Wood how can he go before the SCOTUS and tell the world the truth? Wow. They must really be worried about what these people are going to say at SCOTUS.
Scotus will not “hear” the case on the 19th. They will be reviewing to decide if they will take the case. The most we can hope for is that they agree to the case and even then this will probably be a year before it’s actually heard.
Yup, scotus is slow as molasses.
Do we not have a majority without Roberts? Could he have been removed from his “Chief” position?
Maybe he'll get covid before the case starts.
If he dies then Biden gets to choose the replacement ...
That would line up with him not presiding over the impeachment.
“Chief Justice Thomas” has a nice ring to it.
His absense was very sus during the trial...
He didn’t show because he didn’t have to.
What if Johnheretohelp is John Durham?
This is YUGE
I saw a post where Johnheretohelp says it isn't Clapper in the interview but him. Be nice to get proof he's not a larp.
Johnheretohelp is legit. That is all. And yes, it is him in the Lin Wood whistleblower interview.
I have not seen that. I thought that was a different guy who was talking about Project Looking Glass. Bill Wood I think? If you have a link with Johnheretohelp discussing it, you should send me it.
this is the video in which he lost me. He's totally a demoralization agent. He gets to the end and says we're all fucked as they have the voice of god and essentially we should just give up.
Lol nah. Also if they need to keep him around to continue decoding things he should just remove himself from the board.
Name checks out.
Every time I hear him talk about PLG I feel like I'm having an LSD flashback...
The similarities are eerily similar in many ways
Yeah I saw that, very interesting and cool, but it made me think he’s a larper. Not dooming, but why should I believe this guy?
I saw the video with Clapper speaking. Same voice. Same story. Same words. And the blurred version does look like a bald man. Though not sure what to think about it since Clapper has knowingly lied, and more recently continued the lie about Russian interference. Playing both sides? The non-blurred video was posted on Telegram about a week ago, but cannot remember which account.
There's nothing scheduled for SCOTUS on Feb 19 according to their website. There's nothing until Feb 22, but I don't see anything related to election fraud.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalFebruary2021.html
Here's the full list where you can see everything:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/calendarsandlists.aspx
Wow nice catch! What does that mean exactly?
All that comes out of the 19th is a yes or a no. If it’s a yes, then there will be a date for oral arguments. Then Court will hand down a decision some time after that. Could be October, could be a little earlier, but probably not much.
People keep asking if this case would be expedited, but you have to understand that from the Court’s position there would be no reason to do so, even if they decide to hear any of the cases. They DID expedite the Texas case, remember?
This is the conference where the justices discuss whether or not to take the case. It is not the on the record and no evidence will be presented. Best case scenario is the court decides to hear the case, with a hearing scheduled at some points several months from now. Worst case is we get a one sentence statement saying the court will not hear these cases.
I read somewhere that the cases Would not be “debated” until October even though they are scheduled for February 19th. Is this true? October is way too far away.
It all depends on the hearing schedule of the court. The next available time for oral argument, as it currently stands, would be for October (if that’s true).
Not sure if it’s exactly October, but that sounds about right. It won’t be for several months at the very least.
sToP dAtEfAgGiNg
Been trying to share this whistleblowers intel for weeks, but so few people seem to want to look at it. This is the stuff that Lin Wood based his incredible claims on.
Lin said on Parler, that Jhtp was the same as Ryan Dark White and made a dark to light reference. Clearly, head not using his real name, and is most likely under protection.
I know, right?
I want the evidence, they say. He says he has them on tape plotting to kill judges and the rest of it, but that's not enough unless we get to see it before a jury/tribunal does. Not how the world works, but ok.
He's one I keep an eye on for sure.
Will this be televised at all?
Er wut? Can SCOTUS rule itself out in a conflict of interest? I mean, SCOTUS IS one of the ultimate expressions of the DS and professional class right?
Basically yes. There is no way to enforce a conflict of interest by a scotus justice outside impeaching him.
John was always interesting to listen to! I appreciate your posting this! Thanks
His story is heartbreaking if true! This man endured HELL to tell the truth! If...IF what he says is true.
I don't trust him after that voice of god video. Last year. And the dude can't even use correct grammar ffs.
John is definitely legit. This guy had real info that came to pass on his twitter multiple times. He is what all the LARPs like Parkes and Ward wish they were.
I was under the impression the guy in the video with his face blurred out was James Clapper?? It sure sounds like him!
nice. heard an interview with him a while ago. recognized the voice immediately. i was like "oh. wow."
Does anyone have a link to the full video of the whistleblower?
I'm not going to lie, I listened to a little and kept hearing "I think.." and other speculators words and made less interested. But I didn't know the whistleblower was John here to help. I would like to listen with more engagement.
...what if Roberts doesn't recuse?
I've followed him for a while..Had no idea who he is but feel he's genuine...deserves to be heard.
More discussion on Lin Wood and John Here to Help: https://www.trunews.com/stream/doubled-down-lin-wood-s-salacious-allegations-against-chief-justice-roberts
2843 Feb 20, 2019 9:57:03 PM EST Q !!mG7VJxZNCI >>5294864 (/pb) But, you knew that already. Hence why [AS][SDNY][MW] are attempting to keep the ‘insurance’ scheme ongoing post Mueller. FEAR. The fun begins directly after. Will make the Super Bowl look like a PUPPY SHOW. Q
https://qalerts.pub/?n=2843
Okay, I must've gotten mixed up along the way somewhere. Thanks.
Do we know who he actually is? What his real name is?
Did you read the tweet?
"We'll hear the first discussions of election fraud cases"