6h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] The people who did it will be exposed, and then we'll learn that a political solution was crafted before January 20.
There will almost certainly be more strategic deception about who was really in power the whole time.
But we'll all be made to see that China was behind this disaster, so people won't be prying for the details.
I can't tell you what WILL happen, but think of THIS:
Trump figured out how to do a clandestine devolution.
Isn't it time to finally have faith in him?
END
1+ 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] The devolution took place because there was no constitutional line of succession.
The correct vote count changes the composition of the House and Senate, and it nullifies the Biden administration.
But there are no laws OR constitutional avenues to solve this mess.
The ONLY solution is devolution.
For now.
It won't last for very long, because the military does NOT like this.
So my guess is that we're going to see the presentation of the theft operation.
1+ 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] Devolution happened NOT because the armed forces disagreed with a president.
It happened because our global enemies helped STEAL an election in order to install a puppet who is a de facto enemy agent.
We don't know what happened after January 6 and before January 20.
In order to make devolution perfectly legal and constitutional, Congress would have to have been involved.
My guess is the feud between Trump and McConnell is strategic deception.
1+ 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] Trump trained the military for this.
And they did it because they have PROOF that it's necessary.
No soul searching was involved. It's not like Seven Days in May.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWL06waOAGw
Seven Days In May (1964) Official Trailer - Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas Conspiracy Movie HD www.youtube.com 1 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] It's an open secret that multiple countries have converted transports into strategic bombers.
With electronic warfare (EW) defenses, they can cut through anything the Russians have.
The Germans have a STRATEGIC cruise missile.
And the Gulf Arabs can spoof spy satellites.
I have no doubt that we could pitch in without the Biden administration knowing.
But ALL the military knows that something is up.
They just don't know that we're in devolution.
That's by design.
1 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] Internationally, our allies are holding down the fort.
Believe it or not, NATO is now totally kick-ass.
The Norwegian socialist in charge turned out to be one of Trump's strongest supporters.
He DELEGATED responsibilities, so that smaller countries became pure special-operations units.
Guess which country when on the most dramatic rearmament program on record?
Germany.
Israeli instructors. The German Panzegrenadiers ARE as deadly as they look.
1+ 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] Devolution explains the MASSIVE military air traffic.
Nobody in the Biden administration knows or cares about it, because we're all about bullshit now.
The new Secretary of Defense is interested only in race and climate change.
Biden is senile, and everybody else is working on how to punish Trump AND line their pockets.
Domestically, the states are picking up the slack. Fighting back tooth and nail.
1+ 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] The military rule we're now experiencing is called "devolution."
Trump and the armed forces implemented devolution to PRESERVE the country, not take it over.
Although the devolution staff is in charge, there's no doubt whatsoever that Trump and Pence are "advisors" whose recommendations are considered orders.
BUT.
I'm sure Trump and Pence don't give advice unless asked.
1 7h
Thomas Wictor @[email protected] THREAD
MUST READ by @StevenDouglas
Concerning our stealth military rule right now.
Steven goes into the details.
I'll emphasize a few points not related to Steven's thread.
It all depends on COMPARTMENTED actions.
Such as the Men in Black.
One doesn’t have to be onboard with Q in order to show us the truth. Wicktor found it. He shared it. I couldn’t care less what he thinks of anything Q. X22 Report believes we aren’t in devolution yet. Wicktor proved we are. If anything, when someone doesn’t believe in something but yet sees the outcome clearly, that’s AWESOME. Wicktor should be thanked, not excoriated.
Indeed. The criticisms remind me of similar ones regarding Rush Limbaugh.
Rush would discount anything remotely "conspiratorial" . I even remember hearing him cutoff a very interesting guest discussing anomalies about the explosion of TWA flight 800 out of LaGuardia. It made him uncomfortable.
But I'm okay with that - I just know his limits as a source of information, and look elsewhere for other things. But what he did he did very, very well, and gave a voice to millions of everyday conservatives, and exposed the lies of the Democratic Party. He is and was irreplaceable.
Back to Wictor. One sees what one can see. Not convinced of Q? I don't care. I won't go to him for that. But when things fall within his wheelhouse, I like his analytical skills. And I don't think he feels threatened at all by similar intellect. "I know what I know, and to hell with you if you don't see it." Okay, I'm fine with that.. We're free to read it or not.
This post contains solid theory worth considering.
Strategic deception by Wictor to seperate himself permanently from Q so mockingbird can’t lump him in with their QAnon larp narrative.
Okay. So you don't like Wictor, and your response to the post is to give your opinion as to his true intentions, based on.....whatever. This approach is to sidestep the message and go for the messenger.
Back to the post. Could you share what you know about his theory on devolution? I find it interesting.
Breaking down the details, could you explain where his logic falls short?
Huh? Where did you get that I “don’t like Wictor?”
I fucking love Wictor. I was one of his first 100 followers on twatter before he left for good.
Reread what I wrote.
fwiw, x22 was all about devolution ysterday, seemed right on board.
I guess I'm not seeing the proof. Can you point it out to me?
https://social.quodverum.com/@ThomasWic
If you scroll down, you'll run across his latest comments on this earlier. Then scroll to look for the first thread where he shared the Newsweek article. I'm sorry I can't be more precise, but I'm not quite sure how to navigate his site another way.
Yeah, I read the newsweek article from one of his posts. Still not seeing the "proof". My guess is that it's not there. It's an opinion.