It does not matter what this stuff is technically called that they are trying to poison us with. The bottom line for this woman and for us is the fact that whatever it is called it is still experimental and that is the grounds for refusal - not whether it is called a vaccine, gene therapy, chemotherapy, or drug therapy. This poison is generally understood to be a vaccine by the bulk of the population and is outlined by the CDC as vaccine therapy for COVID-19 and that is what it is classified as under the Emergency Authorization Act by the FDA. These are the definitions as put forward within the system that we are stuck fighting at the moment.
We can argue the minutia on forums like this till we are blue in the face while the machine continues to roll us over and restrict our freedoms. These differences in the semantics do no good for the person desperate to keep a job in order to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads. We can argue with that all day long about definitions, but that is not going to help us much on the battlefield when we are fighting for our life.
Our arguments need get to the point and hit everyone in the chain, from the practitioner to the auxiliaries legally operating within their scope of practice under the supervision of the practionioner. Those responsibilities are defined by each state's medical and dental practice acts and can vary by each state. So, to argue over whether a person jabbing you in the arm has the legal right is futile. We cannot be trying to strain knats and miss the bus in our arguments. By law, both international and US, we have the right to refuse to participate in any medical experiment because of informed consent. It is really that simple.
It does not matter what this stuff is technically called that they are trying to poison us with. The bottom line for this woman and for us is the fact that whatever it is called it is still experimental and that is the grounds for refusal - not whether it is called a vaccine, gene therapy, chemotherapy, or drug therapy. This poison is generally understood to be a vaccine by the bulk of the population and is outlined by the CDC as vaccine therapy for COVID-19 and that is what it is classified as under the Emergency Authorization Act by the FDA. These are the definitions as put forward within the system that we are stuck fighting at the moment.
We can argue the minutia on forums like this till we are blue in the face while the machine continues to roll us over and restrict our freedoms. These differences in the semantics do no good for the person desperate to keep a job in order to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads. We can argue with that all day long about definitions, but that is not going to help us much on the battlefield when we are fighting for our life.
Our arguments need get to the point and hit everyone in the chain, from the practitioner to the auxiliaries legally operating within their scope of practice under the supervision of the practionioner. Those responsibilities are defined by each state's medical and dental practice acts and can vary by each state. So, to argue over whether a person jabbing you in the arm has the legal right is futile. We cannot be trying to strain knats and miss the bus in our arguments. By law, both international and US, we have the right to refuse to participate in any medical experiment because of informed consent. It is really that simple.