These vaccines are not FDA approved. They are under emergency use authorization only. The studies for all coronavirus vaccines are still open and are not due to conclude until at least next year. They are still collecting the data. Therefore, these vaccines are technically considered experimental. Under US informed consent regulations based upon the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki, a person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. There is no way that any health care provider can claim that these vaccines are safe or effective. Those FDA studies are not completed and any claims are preliminary.
To refuse is not being an antivaxer - it is exercising your right to informed consent. In addition, any non healthcare employer is not qualified to give advise as to the risks and benefits of any medically related issue and to do so is practicing medicine without a license and is illegal. This woman has one hell of a lawsuit if she gets the right attorney who understands these facts.
It does not matter what this stuff is technically called that they are trying to poison us with. The bottom line for this woman and for us is the fact that whatever it is called it is still experimental and that is the grounds for refusal - not whether it is called a vaccine, gene therapy, chemotherapy, or drug therapy. This poison is generally understood to be a vaccine by the bulk of the population and is outlined by the CDC as vaccine therapy for COVID-19 and that is what it is classified as under the Emergency Authorization Act by the FDA. These are the definitions as put forward within the system that we are stuck fighting at the moment.
We can argue the minutia on forums like this till we are blue in the face while the machine continues to roll us over and restrict our freedoms. These differences in the semantics do no good for the person desperate to keep a job in order to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads. We can argue with that all day long about definitions, but that is not going to help us much on the battlefield when we are fighting for our life.
Our arguments need get to the point and hit everyone in the chain, from the practitioner to the auxiliaries legally operating within their scope of practice under the supervision of the practionioner. Those responsibilities are defined by each state's medical and dental practice acts and can vary by each state. So, to argue over whether a person jabbing you in the arm has the legal right is futile. We cannot be trying to strain knats and miss the bus in our arguments. By law, both international and US, we have the right to refuse to participate in any medical experiment because of informed consent. It is really that simple.
The problem here is that we can play semantics all day long over what this technically is or is not, but that is not going to help the person trying to keep their job and not be poisoned as a requirement to stay employed. Whatever this is by definition that they are trying to give us is still an experiment. We have the right by law, both US and International Law, to refuse to participate in any medical experiment by informed consent. Americans need to figure this out because it will probably be the only leg they are going to be able to stand on with regards tp refusal right where they live. Remember, employers are not necessarily the brightest crayons in the box either, but, they can smell a good law suit when they see it. The risk of getting hit with multiple law suits over forcing someone by coercion to participate in medical experimentation may be the hammer we need to get them to think twice - not whether this thing is called a vaccine or gene therapy.
Her next call should be to the NY Dept. of Labor, then to a good attorney.
Wrong order. Hire the mouthpiece first. You'll need it. Let it do the talking.
These vaccines are not FDA approved. They are under emergency use authorization only. The studies for all coronavirus vaccines are still open and are not due to conclude until at least next year. They are still collecting the data. Therefore, these vaccines are technically considered experimental. Under US informed consent regulations based upon the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki, a person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. There is no way that any health care provider can claim that these vaccines are safe or effective. Those FDA studies are not completed and any claims are preliminary.
To refuse is not being an antivaxer - it is exercising your right to informed consent. In addition, any non healthcare employer is not qualified to give advise as to the risks and benefits of any medically related issue and to do so is practicing medicine without a license and is illegal. This woman has one hell of a lawsuit if she gets the right attorney who understands these facts.
It does not matter what this stuff is technically called that they are trying to poison us with. The bottom line for this woman and for us is the fact that whatever it is called it is still experimental and that is the grounds for refusal - not whether it is called a vaccine, gene therapy, chemotherapy, or drug therapy. This poison is generally understood to be a vaccine by the bulk of the population and is outlined by the CDC as vaccine therapy for COVID-19 and that is what it is classified as under the Emergency Authorization Act by the FDA. These are the definitions as put forward within the system that we are stuck fighting at the moment.
We can argue the minutia on forums like this till we are blue in the face while the machine continues to roll us over and restrict our freedoms. These differences in the semantics do no good for the person desperate to keep a job in order to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads. We can argue with that all day long about definitions, but that is not going to help us much on the battlefield when we are fighting for our life.
Our arguments need get to the point and hit everyone in the chain, from the practitioner to the auxiliaries legally operating within their scope of practice under the supervision of the practionioner. Those responsibilities are defined by each state's medical and dental practice acts and can vary by each state. So, to argue over whether a person jabbing you in the arm has the legal right is futile. We cannot be trying to strain knats and miss the bus in our arguments. By law, both international and US, we have the right to refuse to participate in any medical experiment because of informed consent. It is really that simple.
Great info! Thanks for sharing, Vaccinefag!
u/#Benderneat
This is what the Left might call a passive abortion.
A eugenics program for sure. I hope this article helped to gain some support for this young mother so she can safely deliver her child.
There is no such thing legally as a Covid-19 Vaccine! It doesn't meet the definition requirements. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/joseph-mercola/covid-19-mrna-shots-are-legally-not-vaccines/
The problem here is that we can play semantics all day long over what this technically is or is not, but that is not going to help the person trying to keep their job and not be poisoned as a requirement to stay employed. Whatever this is by definition that they are trying to give us is still an experiment. We have the right by law, both US and International Law, to refuse to participate in any medical experiment by informed consent. Americans need to figure this out because it will probably be the only leg they are going to be able to stand on with regards tp refusal right where they live. Remember, employers are not necessarily the brightest crayons in the box either, but, they can smell a good law suit when they see it. The risk of getting hit with multiple law suits over forcing someone by coercion to participate in medical experimentation may be the hammer we need to get them to think twice - not whether this thing is called a vaccine or gene therapy.
NY DOL will not be on her side
In that case, securing a good attorney first would be the right move.
She better avoid the democrat impeachment team of lawyers
Some of our lawyers have not exactly been stellar either.