Which do you prefer, narrative with no facts whatsoever which appeals to you in some way, or facts?
Why push Trump not being at Mar-a-Lago when there's absolutely zero problem with him being there and absolute zero photo, video, or witness testimony of him being distant from there?
(Lack of a TFR proves nothing towards that. I would agree you could call it some evidence, but scant, as for example the fact that there's no TFR at Jimmy Carter's residence doesn't prove he's not there.)
Seriously, why love narrative but feel little need for facts?
The thought is that Trump is making it seem as if he is there full-time. He popped up in WPB on President's Day. We see him in the motorcade getting the cheers he deserves. He could show up at the resort just to give the illusion. Also, we don't know when that occurred unless I missed something.
The narrative that Trump isn't at Mar-a-Lago is based on the lack of Temporary Flight Restriction over the place. The mistake is assuming that a TFR is mandatory. It is not. It's merely up to him whether there is one or not.
How could you believe that when we have seen several videos of him there several times weeks before the super bowl then he was there for the actual Super Bowl game and his top staffers have been posting videos on the property along with mike lindell..
You’re right. Dunno why. Just read a few things that made sense: the no flight restriction, the fact that Thomas Wictor spoke about it (I know, for some it’s X22, for me it’s him), the fact that the Q drop spoke of AF1 - I know he’s not living in AF1 but you know, saw it as an indication that he wasn’t there.
Which do you prefer, narrative with no facts whatsoever which appeals to you in some way, or facts?
Why push Trump not being at Mar-a-Lago when there's absolutely zero problem with him being there and absolute zero photo, video, or witness testimony of him being distant from there?
(Lack of a TFR proves nothing towards that. I would agree you could call it some evidence, but scant, as for example the fact that there's no TFR at Jimmy Carter's residence doesn't prove he's not there.)
Seriously, why love narrative but feel little need for facts?
You may be right.
The thought is that Trump is making it seem as if he is there full-time. He popped up in WPB on President's Day. We see him in the motorcade getting the cheers he deserves. He could show up at the resort just to give the illusion. Also, we don't know when that occurred unless I missed something.
Thanks a lot for this answer! This makes complete sense, plus you provided a REAL answer. Much appreciated.
You're welcome.
Trump is going in and out of Florida on a long king walk.
What does it matter? Stick to what you can prove.
He's obviously at Mar-A-Lago.
Literally no reason for him to not be there.
GeorgeNews tags itself from Trump Tower NYC
These idiots need to address the man by his title. What the fuck.
The narrative that Trump isn't at Mar-a-Lago is based on the lack of Temporary Flight Restriction over the place. The mistake is assuming that a TFR is mandatory. It is not. It's merely up to him whether there is one or not.
Thank you!
How could you believe that when we have seen several videos of him there several times weeks before the super bowl then he was there for the actual Super Bowl game and his top staffers have been posting videos on the property along with mike lindell..
You’re right. Dunno why. Just read a few things that made sense: the no flight restriction, the fact that Thomas Wictor spoke about it (I know, for some it’s X22, for me it’s him), the fact that the Q drop spoke of AF1 - I know he’s not living in AF1 but you know, saw it as an indication that he wasn’t there.
The video is great and I love that you posted it...but wth is your headline trying to say?
I was trying to say that I believed the people who said that Trump’s not at Mar-a-Lago, but got my answer now.