Note: I posted the article yesterday about Myanmar arresting celebrities and it received around 700 upvotes last I checked. That post now links to a different article that I had nothing to do with. Also, the original article disappeared from Reuters within a few hours of my original post. Make of that what you will.
No. I'm saying the original article I cited is no longer available for some reason. It makes my original post look suspect when the link doesn't support what the title of the post says. I'm just curious as to why it was removed so quickly.
Note: I posted the article yesterday about Myanmar arresting celebrities and it received around 700 upvotes last I checked. That post now links to a different article that I had nothing to do with. Also, the original article disappeared from Reuters within a few hours of my original post. Make of that what you will.
A good reason to archive and make copies of everything.
FYI pedes, if you are using an ipad you have an option to save the entire web page when you take a screenshot, not just capture what's visible
you can also go to the wayback machine and feed it a url to snapshot for posterity
wow so what are you saying, those websites changed their links to make you look like a racist or silly or something?
No. I'm saying the original article I cited is no longer available for some reason. It makes my original post look suspect when the link doesn't support what the title of the post says. I'm just curious as to why it was removed so quickly.