And what happens if they have this convention and a number of states refuse to abide by the 2/3 majority, or whatever it would require for approval? Oh wait, SCOTUS ruled in the TX vs PA and the other states that TX had no standing. So the last court for redress between the states said they don't give a fuck, and violence is the only way to settle disputes between the states now. OK.
exactly. dangerous and unnecessary. the Constitution isn't broken. the people who swore an oath to uphold it are. Convention of States won't remove corruption.
All of the above are post-constitution laws, institutions, and self-made problems. Abuse of power and corruption endures as long as those at the top benefit more from crime than upholding justice.
A convention of states does not give the people keys to ‘abolish that corrupt government’ but hands the nuke football to the very party establishment criminals already drunk on too much unchecked power.
And what happens if they have this convention and a number of states refuse to abide by the 2/3 majority, or whatever it would require for approval? Oh wait, SCOTUS ruled in the TX vs PA and the other states that TX had no standing. So the last court for redress between the states said they don't give a fuck, and violence is the only way to settle disputes between the states now. OK.
Dangerous door to open. Who's trying to open it?
exactly. dangerous and unnecessary. the Constitution isn't broken. the people who swore an oath to uphold it are. Convention of States won't remove corruption.
I would posit that there are some sorely-needed changes that should be made.
All of the above are post-constitution laws, institutions, and self-made problems. Abuse of power and corruption endures as long as those at the top benefit more from crime than upholding justice.
A convention of states does not give the people keys to ‘abolish that corrupt government’ but hands the nuke football to the very party establishment criminals already drunk on too much unchecked power.