I hate it when a post is just a link to Twitter... but then I also hate it when there isn't a link, and I want to check out, to make sure the poster hasn't altered/fabricated the source material.
In this case, it's indeed legit, and legitimately weird, too... I definitely see a spade there... and maybe an "A", too.
But this is 100% intentional (and as such, was 100% done in post production, because nobody’s waiting around for the photographer to try to get the perfect lens flare when a) good luck replicating that on command!, and b) it’d take 5 minutes, tops, in post-production.)
Thank you!
I hate it when a post is just a link to Twitter... but then I also hate it when there isn't a link, and I want to check out, to make sure the poster hasn't altered/fabricated the source material.
In this case, it's indeed legit, and legitimately weird, too... I definitely see a spade there... and maybe an "A", too.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hReTO4WL/from-steve-cortezs-twitter-image/c/
I know.
That’s simply the plausible deniability factor.
But this is 100% intentional (and as such, was 100% done in post production, because nobody’s waiting around for the photographer to try to get the perfect lens flare when a) good luck replicating that on command!, and b) it’d take 5 minutes, tops, in post-production.)
Not going to argue that as a possibility!
That reminds me of the AceSix4 Logo as pointed out by u/GynaNumbaZero in this little proof about a Dan Scavino tweet:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRLgSIdV/did-my-first-proof---the-acesix4/c/
Note that the suit in the AceSix4 logo is also a spade. I wasn't sure if the spade meant anything until it was pointed out here