Before you can know the truth, you have to look at the lies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2%80%9311_Toyota_vehicle_recalls
From 2007 to now Toyota manufactured vehicles with electronic ignition, electronic brakes, electronic starting, electronic steering and electronic acceleration. In other words, there was no physical, mechanical failsafe for the control of the vehicles.
Time and time again they tried to blame it on something mechanical going on. Floor mats? No. A metal pin missing under the dash? No.
Here's the truth: they turned to a completely electronic control system and the damned things would wig out, the computer would lock all input from the user, and then max out the acceleration (pedal to the floor).
Grandma would be in a ride to hell in 6 seconds flat.
You might think "Oh, I'll just use the brakes!" Nope... They are electronic too.
"I'll just use the emergency brakes!" Nope... Discontinued.
"Oh! I'll take the key out of the ignition! Can't run without the key" Nope... You wanted the push-to-start, it is all electronic. Key in hand, the car is still in a death spiral.
"Well, shit... Here comes a wall..."
And then began the long string of out-of-court settlements paying off families to keep quiet about their loved ones dying in crashes exceeding 120 mph.
Now, what if that was just the trial runs for a new technology? What if they DeepState were simply introducing a new way to cut whistleblower's lives short? It would be quite easy to explain away as an accident. No proof, either, because the computer would most certainly be wrecked beyond function.
More cars than ever are running all-electronic systems. It is cheaper and more corruptible. You want your AI controlled driver? Well, be prepared to go to work every day knowing someone can press your ticket at the push of a button.
Dig deep. People have died. They continue to do so. Nothing new here. Just another distraction from the real news.
You’re arguing pretty hard for this. While I’m sure what you’re saying about remote controlling cars to assassinate people is possible, what makes you think it’s likely in this case? Do we know something about Paul Walker that would have made him a target? Are you basing your entire assumption that he was assassinated based off of the fact that the driver at the time was a professional and couldn’t have possibly made that mistake?
Paul Walker was linked to attempting to expose the clintons crimes against children and child trafficking in haiti.
Yeah see that there is a great reason to be suspicious about his death. I can roll with that.
You don’t NEED to do anything, no. But that’s a good reason to be suspicious and I don’t know why you didn’t just lead with that.
That’s a good goal. To be effective at that though you should probably work on your tone comprehension because you’re treating honest, good faith questions like attacks. Since I’m sure you’re fighting with multiple people right now and might not know what I’m even talking about, I was the guy who politely asked you what we knew about Paul Walker that should make us suspect the Deep State might want him dead. After several unnecessarily defensive replies and name calling you offered up a theory that was actually quite good (that Paul Walker might have known what was going on in Haiti) but for some reason even after I agreed that it was a good theory you continued to treat me as an enemy combatant of some kind.
Have a glass of wine or something bro you’re all wound up.
This is a discussion board it’s pretty standard for onlookers to weigh in as they see fit.
I think the real question is why did you get so defensive when that happened.
Yeah.