So, is Biden actually in control of the Military?
(www.msn.com)
Comments (73)
sorted by:
So there was a report saying Kamala wasn't informed about the strikes
And earlier, reports about Kamala and pelosi wanting to get nuclear codes from Biden.
Now the question deepens, is Biden truley in control???
https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-update-kamala-harris-was-not-informed-prior-to-syrian-airstrike-is-reportedly-very-upset-about-being-left-out-of-the-loop/
It's not "Trumps" military. It's just the military. The way I'm looking at this is a strategic move against Iranian enemies that were done against deep state wishes. Either they don't give a fuck about optics anymore or the reason is that the military has secretly taken command of everything. Forgot one more item, when questioned why NG is still in DC, no one could give an answer.
I get that. But it makes me think of the Myanmar situation. Did they have a commander in chief when they caught the election fraud and took control??
No? Who knows...
No, but the military is in control of him.
You're conflating the significance of this event without due diligence. First and foremost, go find footage of Biden talking about bombing Syria or the reasons for it.
For the life of me, I couldn't find any. I scoured YouTube and C-Span. Zip. You know what I did find? Lots of things like CNN / NBC with all sorts of talking heads yapping about it and to lend it an air of authenticity they speak while split-screened with mute footage of Biden yapping about something...
So what's that something? Nothing, just footage from his earlier covid speech where he doesn't mention Syria in any form.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4948506/president-biden-warns-americans-letting-guard-amid-threat-covid-variants
I've seen Lloyd Austin, the supposed U.S. Secretary for Defense sheepishly mumble some stuff about targets.
Every talking head is with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer trying to push a message "BIDEN AUTHORISED THIS!". BIDEN! Please believe he's the President!
If the reports of American casualties are to believed, then why would Trump be any less likely to respond to that? He wasn't a pacifist. Peace through strength is about powerful deterrence. It isn't a toy collection. Trump doesn't want to have to take the shit out of the box, but he damn well will if he has to.
That said, I do agree that you don't need to get the shit downvoted out of you. I don't see anything forceful or discourteous about how you are asking.
Well if Trump handed the military the power. Couldn't they authorize this bombing?
Feel like you're trying to shove square pegs into round holes on this one.
Syria responding with a nuclear option to American incursions is about as unheard of as North Korea threatening nuclear options in response to sanctions.
You're welcome to your theory and I'm not going to shit on it but at this point, your original question was "So, is Biden actually in control of the Military?" and I have yet to see anything from the horses mouth that suggests that he is even regarding this event but I have seen the usual trickery in MSM reporting which I mentioned previously - which is all gong and no dinner thus far.
The only question that really matters is "Why does nobody know what Trump is doing and how come we see and hear nothing about him given his immense popularity / infamy?".
You want to entertain a hypothetical? Maybe because nobody is allowed to for one reason or another.
The best part of all this - Pelosi and Kamala don't know if he's being honest or if the dementia is kicking in.
I'll wait for actual video of U.S. military dropping the bombs before I give my opinion.
Someone on this forum pointed out the film, Wag the Dog. I don't know if we'll ever know the real details about the attack.
Could have been authorized under Trump as a action/reaction scenario?
Just brainstorming
I’d say he’s barely in control of his nap schedule.
Really? And why do you say that?
A military move against who?
Who said the military move was against Iran?
I still haven't seen pics of the bombing sites...
I don't trust any news article
Your approach can be discredited.
If the report, as you say, is legitimate. Then everything must be taken as legitimate within. So, it was a response to strikes by militia groups over a month ago that killed Americans. Biden is in charge. Nothing more to be said. It is 100% pure and legitimate, everything reported on.
Most here believe the Orange Man is in charge and as do I. Nobody here is interested in proving to you why that is. You can find out yourself, the choice is yours.
Your approach is treating this report like a salad bar, where you take the pieces from it that you like and leave the rest. To you, the report is legit, it confirms Biden is in charge but the reason for the strike is disregarded and instead transposed to give your theory that it means a restart of corrupt monetarily driven wars weight when nothing of the sort was reported on in the report that you claimed legitimate.
You're now wasting peoples time.
That would be a negatory.
Why would obama (his controller) strike against Iranian backed terrorists? obama takes both knees for iran. he's their bitch, why would he hit their assets. How does that make sense especially since they want to reopen the nuclear deal.
The strikes were Iranian targets. Why would Biden, who wants to bring backl the Iran deal, bomb those?
Biden probably wears Depends. I doubt he is control of anything.
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEDiL3DDUcAISHcG.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fhashtag%2Fmountgrabbler&tbnid=MQVBrjLCK_pokM&vet=12ahUKEwjdgs7vxYbvAhW4cTABHcxdAIMQMygeegQIARBr..i&docid=GfWtEXj0xIkJmM&w=1024&h=512&q=grabbler%20meme&client=firefox-b-1-d&ved=2ahUKEwjdgs7vxYbvAhW4cTABHcxdAIMQMygeegQIARBr
Are you going to pretend you’re not an obvious shill?
I'm saying you just showed up here just to fervently push this assertion that this continuation of our military's effort to constrain Iran means that "Biden (or "his people") is actually in control of the Military."
Honest question, that you dodged once before: You're not here as a genuine Q supporter, are you?
We both know the answer.
In fact, everybody knows you're a concern troll.
And so the next question: Then why are you here?
Planefags would like a word with you.