Funny enough (or not)... NaturalNews sourced an article that in no way correlated the Covid19 vaccine mRNA to cancer causing as is suggested. The article was only referring to naturally occurring mRNA. It's a pretty pathetic attempt. There are much better arguments and reasons to not get the vaccine. This ain't one of them.
Regardless this can be used to show that it's not "settled science" or particularly safe. It can be used to show that it is a shot in the dark (maybe literally).
While I agree the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not shown to be safe (far from it) and that they are "a shot in the dark" in the sense that you mean it, this article can NOT be used to show that. As PurpleTea stated above, there is zero meaningful relationship between the topic of this article and the immunotherapy (mislabeled as a vaccine) that are being injected into the unwitting masses.
To put it simply, people who are completely clueless about molecular and cellular biology (as the author of the article clearly is) should not be writing stories about those topics. This article is what we call "disinformation."
An mRNA vaccine was completely unnecessary! They could have expressed the “spike protein” in a recombinant manner, purified the protein as a vaccine and used the purified protein to prompt an immune response. To actually introduce mRNA into your system to get your own body to express a foreign viral protein was unnecessary and can only be justified if you have other nefarious purposes for the “vaccine”. That’s why I refuse to take it!
It’s important to note that mRNAs are a normal component of all cells and the specific ones discussed here are not involved in mRNA-based vaccines, like the one developed against SARS-CoV-2.
Though the quote and cited paper are not immediately related.
Being a retard in all things biology, I can't conclude whether the vaccine would put you at increased risk of cancer.
That mRNA is a normal component in a process to produce proteins, hacking that particular system with an artificial interference is questionable, unless you know exactly what you are doing.
To compare:
Say you have a container in a piece of code. Say: $DNA. Within this container is a list of sequences: ABCG.
When the program calls on $DNA, it gets fueled with ABCG.
So far so good, right.
What if, you introduce a piece of code, that calls on $DNA, but it rearranges the sequence to GCBA, or ABGC, or BACG, etc.
The result is not what you normally get, but something completely different, something garbled.
That garbled piece may or may not help in targeting one specific issue, but introduced at a specific level of the program, it can totally render the original program useless.
That is exactly what we are looking at. Breaking the natural barriers and processes to do what? The consequences are quite clear. Training your body to produce one specific product, invests the whole natural body.
The source is crap, and if you do a search for "Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins" you get ZERO credible sources on crackpot retard sites.
It’s important to note that mRNAs are a normal component of all cells and the specific ones discussed here are not involved in mRNA-based vaccines, like the one developed against SARS-CoV-2.
Though the quote and cited paper are not immediately related.
Being a retard in all things biology, I can't conclude whether the vaccine would put you at increased risk of cancer.
Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.”
March 2 2021: Death, “Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”
https://archive.vn/YyaeR
“There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground”
“Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.”
Who said tumors and cancer is bad? Oh right Rockefeller medical doctors owned by big pharma. Cancer and tumors are actually the bodies way of healing itself thats like saying livers cause cancer from drinking.
Funny enough (or not)... NaturalNews sourced an article that in no way correlated the Covid19 vaccine mRNA to cancer causing as is suggested. The article was only referring to naturally occurring mRNA. It's a pretty pathetic attempt. There are much better arguments and reasons to not get the vaccine. This ain't one of them.
Not many people read source any more...
Believe what you want
Regardless this can be used to show that it's not "settled science" or particularly safe. It can be used to show that it is a shot in the dark (maybe literally).
While I agree the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not shown to be safe (far from it) and that they are "a shot in the dark" in the sense that you mean it, this article can NOT be used to show that. As PurpleTea stated above, there is zero meaningful relationship between the topic of this article and the immunotherapy (mislabeled as a vaccine) that are being injected into the unwitting masses.
To put it simply, people who are completely clueless about molecular and cellular biology (as the author of the article clearly is) should not be writing stories about those topics. This article is what we call "disinformation."
Follow the link above to the article in Nature.
An mRNA vaccine was completely unnecessary! They could have expressed the “spike protein” in a recombinant manner, purified the protein as a vaccine and used the purified protein to prompt an immune response. To actually introduce mRNA into your system to get your own body to express a foreign viral protein was unnecessary and can only be justified if you have other nefarious purposes for the “vaccine”. That’s why I refuse to take it!
That is a very astute remark! Thank you.
Quit calling it a vaccine
Which is why I put “vaccine” in quotation marks!
Highly doubtful... no study is cited, nor are any Sloan-Kettering researchers named. Red flags.
They did a terrible job at formatting, but if you dig through the sources you arrive at:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0465-8
As well as:
Though the quote and cited paper are not immediately related.
Being a retard in all things biology, I can't conclude whether the vaccine would put you at increased risk of cancer.
That mRNA is a normal component in a process to produce proteins, hacking that particular system with an artificial interference is questionable, unless you know exactly what you are doing.
To compare:
Say you have a container in a piece of code. Say: $DNA. Within this container is a list of sequences: ABCG.
When the program calls on $DNA, it gets fueled with ABCG.
So far so good, right.
What if, you introduce a piece of code, that calls on $DNA, but it rearranges the sequence to GCBA, or ABGC, or BACG, etc.
The result is not what you normally get, but something completely different, something garbled.
That garbled piece may or may not help in targeting one specific issue, but introduced at a specific level of the program, it can totally render the original program useless.
That is exactly what we are looking at. Breaking the natural barriers and processes to do what? The consequences are quite clear. Training your body to produce one specific product, invests the whole natural body.
This "Vaccine" IS the virus.
Good dig, I couldn't find that citation. Thanks... and you're right, I don't immediately see the connection either.
NaturalNews never linked to the actual paper or even mentioned the researchers who conducted the study. This is fake news
So much for the “science”
"After your Covid vaccination, RNA is transported out of your cell’s nucleus, and will no longer function properly as a cancer tumor suppressor".
The source is crap, and if you do a search for "Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins" you get ZERO credible sources on crackpot retard sites.
Yeah, this is what I'm concerned with for long vaccine injuries
So mrna vax is cancer trap...
Here is the direct link to the study:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0465-8
This needs to be disseminated far and wide.
They did a terrible job at formatting, but if you dig through the sources you arrive at:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0465-8
As well as:
Though the quote and cited paper are not immediately related.
Being a retard in all things biology, I can't conclude whether the vaccine would put you at increased risk of cancer.
Most up to date PDF Compilation of vaccine articles. March 2 2021, https://files.catbox.moe/bzjp43.pdf
Additional Resource: https://pastelink.net/vaccinedeaths
https://vaccineimpact.com/
Feb 26 2021 "CDC caught shaving DEATH's from VAERS System!" https://www.bitchute.com/video/IusxOn0sWL59/
Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.” March 2 2021: Death, “Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines” https://archive.vn/YyaeR “There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground” “Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.”
Video: kids run from forced vaccination in Africa https://video.maga.host/videos/watch/c6a08110-cac2-401f-88c3-0bb0429a3c16
March 1 2021: Baby Death, “3 Dozen Cases of Spontaneous Miscarriages, Stillbirths Occurring After COVID-19 Vaccination” https://archive.vn/y2X5h
March 1 2021: “Number of Injuries Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Climbs by Nearly 4,000 in One Week” https://archive.vn/85K0I
Who said tumors and cancer is bad? Oh right Rockefeller medical doctors owned by big pharma. Cancer and tumors are actually the bodies way of healing itself thats like saying livers cause cancer from drinking.