It was my understanding that there was also a link with "George" and the JFK JR Magazine? Is that just me?
The access to photo's and video always struck me as strange when I first saw George on one of the "Mercy ships" at the start of the China virus, I assumed they were either part of the military to get that close for footage, or connected via Trump with his blessing?
I can see this as a trap though, a way to feed our confirmation bias, I just don't know anymore?
Is it simply a way to placate us, keep us thinking or hoping for the next BOOM until the time is right and pull the trapdoor? Or keeping us together for the far left to use as the crazy terry - wrists (aka March 4th) enemy until gun control comes in?
PS Personally I can see the use of capitalisation for the word Politics as perfectly normal and a correct use of it.
Thanks for the reply, stupidly I hadn't noticed the "just" my bad!
I find myself now often wondering how with this much cancel culture and censorship buzzing around the internet, how some channels on YT are still up? Surely if anything Q related or perceived is instantly banned how are these few channels still going. The fact that they get donations may well be the key if we can see who they ultimately go too.
More research I guess to see where the money trail goes.
I would say, as with Q, go to the source. Read their messages in telegram thoroughly, as well as comments (they sometimes answer questions or give clarifications), and the live chats are very interesting. There is also a TON of interesting content on their youtube. Seeing what they actually say, how they say it, and what they DON'T say is very important. For example, while there does seem to be a connection between them and JFK jr (who started the original magazine, as we all know), many people have claimed that "George" is Jr, but he/they have never responded to any of those statements, as far as I've ever seen (and they've had plenty of chances). There have also been many very good discussions on this board but good links and analysis to help tie different things together and provide evidence/food for thought for at least some of the questions you're asking.
It was my understanding that there was also a link with "George" and the JFK JR Magazine? Is that just me?
The access to photo's and video always struck me as strange when I first saw George on one of the "Mercy ships" at the start of the China virus, I assumed they were either part of the military to get that close for footage, or connected via Trump with his blessing?
I can see this as a trap though, a way to feed our confirmation bias, I just don't know anymore?
Is it simply a way to placate us, keep us thinking or hoping for the next BOOM until the time is right and pull the trapdoor? Or keeping us together for the far left to use as the crazy terry - wrists (aka March 4th) enemy until gun control comes in?
PS Personally I can see the use of capitalisation for the word Politics as perfectly normal and a correct use of it.
What about the time that they requested a Sunday script and Pompeo tweeted something corresponding? What about HELLO GEORGE?
But it was rather corresponding if I remember. Also, I thought the thing about Q drops is they are predictive of future events?
Thanks for the reply, stupidly I hadn't noticed the "just" my bad!
I find myself now often wondering how with this much cancel culture and censorship buzzing around the internet, how some channels on YT are still up? Surely if anything Q related or perceived is instantly banned how are these few channels still going. The fact that they get donations may well be the key if we can see who they ultimately go too.
More research I guess to see where the money trail goes.
I would say, as with Q, go to the source. Read their messages in telegram thoroughly, as well as comments (they sometimes answer questions or give clarifications), and the live chats are very interesting. There is also a TON of interesting content on their youtube. Seeing what they actually say, how they say it, and what they DON'T say is very important. For example, while there does seem to be a connection between them and JFK jr (who started the original magazine, as we all know), many people have claimed that "George" is Jr, but he/they have never responded to any of those statements, as far as I've ever seen (and they've had plenty of chances). There have also been many very good discussions on this board but good links and analysis to help tie different things together and provide evidence/food for thought for at least some of the questions you're asking.
Look forward to seeing what you find out, will also try and research the money/owners trail.