Thanks for the reply, stupidly I hadn't noticed the "just" my bad!
I find myself now often wondering how with this much cancel culture and censorship buzzing around the internet, how some channels on YT are still up? Surely if anything Q related or perceived is instantly banned how are these few channels still going. The fact that they get donations may well be the key if we can see who they ultimately go too.
More research I guess to see where the money trail goes.
I would say, as with Q, go to the source. Read their messages in telegram thoroughly, as well as comments (they sometimes answer questions or give clarifications), and the live chats are very interesting. There is also a TON of interesting content on their youtube. Seeing what they actually say, how they say it, and what they DON'T say is very important. For example, while there does seem to be a connection between them and JFK jr (who started the original magazine, as we all know), many people have claimed that "George" is Jr, but he/they have never responded to any of those statements, as far as I've ever seen (and they've had plenty of chances). There have also been many very good discussions on this board but good links and analysis to help tie different things together and provide evidence/food for thought for at least some of the questions you're asking.
Thanks for the reply, stupidly I hadn't noticed the "just" my bad!
I find myself now often wondering how with this much cancel culture and censorship buzzing around the internet, how some channels on YT are still up? Surely if anything Q related or perceived is instantly banned how are these few channels still going. The fact that they get donations may well be the key if we can see who they ultimately go too.
More research I guess to see where the money trail goes.
I would say, as with Q, go to the source. Read their messages in telegram thoroughly, as well as comments (they sometimes answer questions or give clarifications), and the live chats are very interesting. There is also a TON of interesting content on their youtube. Seeing what they actually say, how they say it, and what they DON'T say is very important. For example, while there does seem to be a connection between them and JFK jr (who started the original magazine, as we all know), many people have claimed that "George" is Jr, but he/they have never responded to any of those statements, as far as I've ever seen (and they've had plenty of chances). There have also been many very good discussions on this board but good links and analysis to help tie different things together and provide evidence/food for thought for at least some of the questions you're asking.
Look forward to seeing what you find out, will also try and research the money/owners trail.