I think a lot of the info in that post are circumstantial. Paper.li being a lefty organisation and the companies showcased there all being lefty - thats purely circumstantial. All those are really big companies and clearly they will showcase their biggest customers. And it so happens we are living in a clown era where all big corporates are pandering to the left. This is more a reflection that the entire infrastructure has been infiltrated by the left, than anything else.
Typos, capitalisations, wrong spelling etc really don't bother me as well. So what if they are foreigners.
To me the most compelling argument is that the content they posted claiming it to be their own happened to be taken from some site, and they banned when asked about it.
Agreed - every piece of evidence Evspra has presented is at best circumstantial. I started to write up a response post but it's a waste of time. Those who think for themselves can easily see how his take on George does not fit the facts.
I am not 100% convinced George News is legit, but many of the conclusions Evpsra draws about them are illogical. His posts read the same as anyone else who has "debunked" George.
As always, the prime directive is to think for yourself.
whether George is legit or not, I don’t like how it’s now banned from this site because one person said so. This is no better than Twitter with this slippery slope of censorship...
This drives the nail into the coffin if anyone has any doubts.
I think a lot of the info in that post are circumstantial. Paper.li being a lefty organisation and the companies showcased there all being lefty - thats purely circumstantial. All those are really big companies and clearly they will showcase their biggest customers. And it so happens we are living in a clown era where all big corporates are pandering to the left. This is more a reflection that the entire infrastructure has been infiltrated by the left, than anything else.
Typos, capitalisations, wrong spelling etc really don't bother me as well. So what if they are foreigners.
To me the most compelling argument is that the content they posted claiming it to be their own happened to be taken from some site, and they banned when asked about it.
Agreed - every piece of evidence Evspra has presented is at best circumstantial. I started to write up a response post but it's a waste of time. Those who think for themselves can easily see how his take on George does not fit the facts.
I am not 100% convinced George News is legit, but many of the conclusions Evpsra draws about them are illogical. His posts read the same as anyone else who has "debunked" George.
As always, the prime directive is to think for yourself.
whether George is legit or not, I don’t like how it’s now banned from this site because one person said so. This is no better than Twitter with this slippery slope of censorship...