I think many here are so tired of waiting, so desperate for the ball to move somewhere, that they saw today's George News "takedown" as a victory for the movement.
If George is a fraud then today was a victory. But I'm not seeing the kind of evidence needed to make that conclusion.
The good news is that feeding-frenzies like this indicate that final shake-outs are underway, and we'll have a better idea who's good and who's dirty sooner rather than later.
Yea Evspra blowing open the dam sending George News into panic mode saying they’ve been infiltrated by bots... Showing where they got their pics and videos. Who owns their platform. That they used RSBN for their streaming instead of doing their own by being there. Getting insta-banned by mentioning the very site where the pics/videos were retrieved from.
The RNC reaches millions, GEORGE is not nearly that big, could just be the case that he hasn't even caught wind of them yet, or he did but considers them too small fry to go after.
edit: I see the weak minded are having a tough time letting go of one of their crutches, so here, Ima turn this around.
You say once GEOTUS sues GEORGE you'll stop believing them?
How about this? I'll believe them when he endorses them personally, if they are as close as they claim they are, that should be trivial for them to get no?
Much easier for him to endorse them if they're legit, then it is for him to sue them if they are not no?
Just a 5 second clip of him saying, "yeah hey GEORGE news, you're doing a good job", that's all it would take.
If you check the YT streams, you will see there was very little donating going on. Almost all of the superchats are from a certain account which appears to be associated with George - meaning they are donating to themselves.
I have watched George for weeks, and they have not once solicited donations. Once or twice per stream they link to their merch store, but that's it. Even X22 comes across as more pitchy.
That is (only) one part of Evspra's case that does not add up, in my opinion.
The merch selling do not concern me not one bit, I commented that on another post.
I see nothing wrong with selling merch, having sponsors or even asking for donations if providing an useful service, such as X22 does, we're not communists after all, I find it silly when people go up in arms whenever someone does so, but then complain about leftists demanding "free" stuff.
No, the biggest problem is them appropriating videos as if they were their own, and way worse, the way they handled people bringing this up, as in, banning them immediately, that's the problem there.
True enough, though the video was posted many hours on that DVIDS site before it was on George's telegram..
But again, that's not the most damning thing, if people claiming this are wrong, why ban them?
I've said this many times as well, even with all the claims and evidence of foul play I'd still be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but the banning/suppression has no explanation or excuse.
Exactly, but when you come out and actually say "noooo please don't donate!" it feels more like someone trying to look humble, and therefore only foster more donations by good willing people.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but one can turn superchats off on their live-streams no? so if they REALLY don't want people donating, why don't they turn it off?
I'm confused as to the current anger, are they not on our side for sure? They seem to have some liberal media connections, but I don't feel like we should start eating our own like a pack of liberals, perhaps just not posting links is enough??
Disinformation is necessary.
We have been played, but think of how badly everyone else was played. Hold the line untill our general says so. Don't fire untill you see the whites of their eyes.
Even with all said evidence I'd still give them the benefit of the doubt
But them banning people that were just bringing this up? that right there is hard to rationalize, if they were what they claim they are, they would never do that, actually they'd use the opportunity to further prove their legitimacy.
And the pedes were not even doing so in an accusatory manner, just people going like "Hey, could you comment on your videos coming from this place?", immediately banned.
But as far as I know, Evspra (the mod that did most of the digging) simply asked about it, once, not even spamming, and they banned her (I believe she's a lady)
If you were legit and a seemingly coordinated attack happened, what would you say?
I’ll repeat this again and again.
Trump is litigious. He literally just served a cease and desist to the RNC for them to stop using his likeness etc.
George has not been sued. They continue to sell on his likeness. Once this changes, I’ll revisit my opinion.
Indeed. And at this time, I think the mods might be inclined to take a deep look at the shillpack currently swarming the "bad George" narrative.
I think many here are so tired of waiting, so desperate for the ball to move somewhere, that they saw today's George News "takedown" as a victory for the movement.
If George is a fraud then today was a victory. But I'm not seeing the kind of evidence needed to make that conclusion.
I read all of those this morning, and disagree with many of their conclusions.
The good news is that feeding-frenzies like this indicate that final shake-outs are underway, and we'll have a better idea who's good and who's dirty sooner rather than later.
And Evspra deleted their account.
Huh.
Yea Evspra blowing open the dam sending George News into panic mode saying they’ve been infiltrated by bots... Showing where they got their pics and videos. Who owns their platform. That they used RSBN for their streaming instead of doing their own by being there. Getting insta-banned by mentioning the very site where the pics/videos were retrieved from.
Your circle back comment is entertaining.
The RNC reaches millions, GEORGE is not nearly that big, could just be the case that he hasn't even caught wind of them yet, or he did but considers them too small fry to go after.
edit: I see the weak minded are having a tough time letting go of one of their crutches, so here, Ima turn this around.
You say once GEOTUS sues GEORGE you'll stop believing them?
How about this? I'll believe them when he endorses them personally, if they are as close as they claim they are, that should be trivial for them to get no?
Much easier for him to endorse them if they're legit, then it is for him to sue them if they are not no?
Just a 5 second clip of him saying, "yeah hey GEORGE news, you're doing a good job", that's all it would take.
I will wait for another Q or Q+ post on the matter.
Yeah, clever way to paint yourself as a good guy isn't it? what did you expect? for them to go:
"YES!! KEEP DONATING!! YEEEESSSSS!!" *rubs hands together*
If you check the YT streams, you will see there was very little donating going on. Almost all of the superchats are from a certain account which appears to be associated with George - meaning they are donating to themselves.
I have watched George for weeks, and they have not once solicited donations. Once or twice per stream they link to their merch store, but that's it. Even X22 comes across as more pitchy.
That is (only) one part of Evspra's case that does not add up, in my opinion.
The merch selling do not concern me not one bit, I commented that on another post.
I see nothing wrong with selling merch, having sponsors or even asking for donations if providing an useful service, such as X22 does, we're not communists after all, I find it silly when people go up in arms whenever someone does so, but then complain about leftists demanding "free" stuff.
No, the biggest problem is them appropriating videos as if they were their own, and way worse, the way they handled people bringing this up, as in, banning them immediately, that's the problem there.
I don't think it has been proven they are appropriating videos.
True enough, though the video was posted many hours on that DVIDS site before it was on George's telegram..
But again, that's not the most damning thing, if people claiming this are wrong, why ban them?
I've said this many times as well, even with all the claims and evidence of foul play I'd still be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but the banning/suppression has no explanation or excuse.
They could just not comment on the donations.
Exactly, but when you come out and actually say "noooo please don't donate!" it feels more like someone trying to look humble, and therefore only foster more donations by good willing people.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but one can turn superchats off on their live-streams no? so if they REALLY don't want people donating, why don't they turn it off?
Good point. Very good point.
I'm confused as to the current anger, are they not on our side for sure? They seem to have some liberal media connections, but I don't feel like we should start eating our own like a pack of liberals, perhaps just not posting links is enough??
Yeah, I'm with you, this seems off/weird somehow.
No outside comms
Disinformation is necessary. We have been played, but think of how badly everyone else was played. Hold the line untill our general says so. Don't fire untill you see the whites of their eyes.
The final nail is the shills here trying to guilt us into believing his brand of disinformation
" WHO'S COFFIN. i DONT SEE NO COFFIN" ..... must be somebody else. "fuck i gotta quit doing that"
Chief Justice Roberts decided that no comment was required. (Ever)
Even with all said evidence I'd still give them the benefit of the doubt
But them banning people that were just bringing this up? that right there is hard to rationalize, if they were what they claim they are, they would never do that, actually they'd use the opportunity to further prove their legitimacy.
And the pedes were not even doing so in an accusatory manner, just people going like "Hey, could you comment on your videos coming from this place?", immediately banned.
Could be, it's a possibility
But as far as I know, Evspra (the mod that did most of the digging) simply asked about it, once, not even spamming, and they banned her (I believe she's a lady)
Same with many others.
I'm happy to see level-headed comments like this in these George threads.
This morning left me a little disappointed.