How do you explain George News cutting Evspra because they asked about the dvidshub.net media they were using to make them look legit?

George may have banned because they got caught and wanted to silence. Or it could be because Evspra asked a question that looks an awful lot like a shill attack. I'm not saying it was, but it could conceivably be taken as such.

I myself (and several others) are banned just because we asked them to address dvidshub.net.

When one person asks a question that looks like a shill attack, and then more follow up, it looks like an outside attack from a GROUP of shills.

Instead of saying something like "yea those are not original videos sorry for being misleading" or something along those lines or addressing it they shut off comments and haven't said anything about it. Oh wait I'm sorry they did say something to the effect of "You will regret doubting us".

I do not justify my behavior to shills, do you?

Someone correct me if I'm worng.

I'm not saying you are wrong. I am only saying I do not believe you are right. There is a big distinction between the two. The evidence that has been provided against George.news is compelling, but not sufficient to meet the standards of any court of law. Much more important than that though, even if they are Paytriots (or worse) there is still no reason to threaten bans for linking to their posts as we have been doing for a couple months.

Such acts of totalitarianism and censorship cause me to be more wary of Evspra than George.news.

The only places I’ve seen this mentioned is GAW. On absolutely no other platform have I seen GAW mentioned. Troll-initiated disinformation campaigns “originating” from TDW or GAW is not new at all.

For all I know, the assertion that trolls were pestering the chat could completely be true, and that Ev and others really were mistakenly banned. Maybe GN and dvids are actually one and the same entity and GN merely acts as an aggregate same way we do. Maybe Telegram’s been suffering bad phishing attacks for some time and any unauthorized links get autobanned.

I wouldn’t know. There’s not enough information, and there’s already huge gaps in logic being made here.

Screencaps motherfucker, or back off.

Lin Wood has cross referenced GN several times. He’s also endorsed GE, who was similarly removed from Twitter. GE has also endorsed GN.

Of course, this probably won’t convince you since you’re of the mindset that if (x22) endorses GN, then (x22) is similarly comped. This then raises the question, if x22’s information is faulty, then so is Lin Wood’s and countless others.

So far, the only evidence actually provided is circumstantial evidence (software used, API, etc. etc) but nothing on what kind of outfit GN actually is, properly outlines business registries, definitive proof GN has no military ties whatsoever.

Most of the armed forces (forward facing) still rely on publicly available infrastructure. The US Army got into trouble a while back for doing a semi-recruitment run through Twitch. Does that mean the entirety of the Army is rot?

What this drive does is completely eliminate a source of redpills. Even AJ wasn’t a Q supporter, but what he did do was help raise suspicion through his own behavior driving more people here.

When we say “hold the line,” this is what we mean. GAW should and continue to remain a content aggregation source, not a narrative driving source. We don’t turn on a dime because someone tells us to.

I will continue to watch GN from a distance, but this does not mean that the GAW staff are necessarily reliable either. There is also the possibility that both are bad actors as well.