Dr Judy Wood termed the phrase 'dustification' and claims ONLY directed energy weapons can do that.
There was a Russian nuclear expert who said the same, but with nukes.
Then the crater and lava for weeks.
Then the cancer in the first responders.
I don't even believe there were any planes. See Ace Baker and 'pinocchio's nose'.
See also Chopper 5 cameramans sideline business in video compositing.
The whole thing stinks 19 years later and what?
We're supposed to believe anything's gonna get done about a few fake ballots?
um, how do you know they died on the planes...oh right because their perfectly undamaged IDs were found on top of all the debris on ground level
it's been so long ago since i was down this rabit hole, but there's flight tracking evidence i believe and there eye witness testimony that a commercial airliner plane landed at Fort Devins or some Massachusetts air base
"planes" that crashed in to Pentagon and in PA left no evidence that people died on them or that they were even planes...do your homework. there's so much clearly convincing evidence it'll make you question your sanity
It can be both. Planes (originals, decoys, remote controlled or otherwise) can still crash into the buildings on 9/11 AND news outlets can fudge/fabricate footage (so that it’s dramatic enough for their narrative). I never understood why the planes had to be all real, or all fake, when it would make perfect sense to mix CGI in with real footage.
Tell me, how many times have you seen a plane hit a building in real life? How many times have you seen giant explosions in real life? How many large fires have you seen in real life?
I ask because you say it looks fake as hell, but if you've never seen it with your own eyes then you, by definition, don't know what a "real" one would look like.
Dr Judy Wood termed the phrase 'dustification' and claims ONLY directed energy weapons can do that. There was a Russian nuclear expert who said the same, but with nukes. Then the crater and lava for weeks. Then the cancer in the first responders. I don't even believe there were any planes. See Ace Baker and 'pinocchio's nose'. See also Chopper 5 cameramans sideline business in video compositing. The whole thing stinks 19 years later and what? We're supposed to believe anything's gonna get done about a few fake ballots?
But people died on those planes
um, how do you know they died on the planes...oh right because their perfectly undamaged IDs were found on top of all the debris on ground level
it's been so long ago since i was down this rabit hole, but there's flight tracking evidence i believe and there eye witness testimony that a commercial airliner plane landed at Fort Devins or some Massachusetts air base
"planes" that crashed in to Pentagon and in PA left no evidence that people died on them or that they were even planes...do your homework. there's so much clearly convincing evidence it'll make you question your sanity
It can be both. Planes (originals, decoys, remote controlled or otherwise) can still crash into the buildings on 9/11 AND news outlets can fudge/fabricate footage (so that it’s dramatic enough for their narrative). I never understood why the planes had to be all real, or all fake, when it would make perfect sense to mix CGI in with real footage.
Tell me, how many times have you seen a plane hit a building in real life? How many times have you seen giant explosions in real life? How many large fires have you seen in real life?
I ask because you say it looks fake as hell, but if you've never seen it with your own eyes then you, by definition, don't know what a "real" one would look like.
Amsterdam high rise apartments.
Afghanistan was a easy target because a few years earlier there was another Wag the Dog event: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Infinite_Reach#Aftermath