those complaining about citizenjournalist
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (194)
sorted by:
Yeah this is the only thing I see that doesnt make sense.
Edit: the Biden one is taken at a lower angle and farther away. It’s catching the top of the building rather than the windows. Biden is in the real whitehouse. People need to stop with this
Look at the architecture... There are 4 Corbels and what appears to be a second floor to the structure, on the top there are no corbels and buildings behind it, no second story to the building.
The corbels are there they just aren't as visible. What interests me more is the second story in the lower picture. Of course, that could have been shopped in upper photo.
https://www.google.com/search?q=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjP4K_HlK7vAhUOAlMKHa57CgkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoCCAA6BAgAEB46BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeUMr4AVj0lgJgn5sCaABwAHgAgAGRAogB5g6SAQU0LjQuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=jydNYI_dOI6EzAKu96lI&bih=663&biw=1280&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS751US760#imgrc=1_EeHO3xx5TiiM&imgdii=EMjo39STAQksjM
This angle of things makes it seem like it could just be a camera elevation eye trick...
the corbels are harder to see because the lack of shadows from a cloudy day.
above the roof line... what we are seeing is a difference of perspective from the photographers. one was taken up close, while the other photo was taken from further back but zoomed in. the further you are from the building, the more will be visible above the roof line. https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
look at the tree on the left, its the same size and shape and location in both photos.
conclusion: Richard was worked up and made a mistake. it happens to the best of us.
Perspective doesn't matter. The top image doesn't have the 2nd floor windows
The lower photo with potus Trump clearly indicates a second story with windows. There's even a ladder visible. The upper photo shows no such second story. Why? Was it shopped? I have no idea, but I don't think the perspectives are that different when you look at the relative shape of objects like the glass doors, columns, etc. If there's a second story, it should be clearly visible.
Forget the corbels. Try to match the 2nd floor windows
https://www.google.com/search?q=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjP4K_HlK7vAhUOAlMKHa57CgkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoCCAA6BAgAEB46BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeUMr4AVj0lgJgn5sCaABwAHgAgAGRAogB5g6SAQU0LjQuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=jydNYI_dOI6EzAKu96lI&bih=663&biw=1280&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS751US760#imgrc=1_EeHO3xx5TiiM&imgdii=EMjo39STAQksjM
From this angle it appears it might be real. I do believe its a camera elevation issue. I don't want them to be there, but it could be legit.
There are many here that are having a problem understanding how camera angles are at play in these two photos.
It's a pretty crude sketch but it will explain why the 2nd floor can't be seen in one of the pictures.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
lets do an experiment!
if you live in a two story home and you walk onto your front lawn and look back at your house. look up! do you see the shingles on your roof? no, of course not.
now walk across the street and look back at your house. look up!, do you see the shingles on your house? Yes!
this is perspective. one photo was taken up close, while the other photo was taken from further away but zoomed in. this is what you are seeing
Shut up, Mike! lol
It’s taken from a different angle. Find an Ariel view of the same place and you will understand
I looked this up in Google Earth and measured the distances. The building Trump is standing in front of is actually a one-story building which is an extension/annexe to a taller main building. The so called "second story" windows belong to the main building further back, and are located 13 m behind the wall section with the corbels. This means that a small change of perspective, i.e. taking the photo a little bit closer to the podium, could make these windows disappear from the photo. That said, these images are too cropped to determine this either way with any certainty.
Yup!
There are many here that are having a problem understanding how camera angles are at play in these two photos.
It's a pretty crude sketch but it will explain why the 2nd floor can't be seen in one of the pictures.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
Those were not taken at the same place. Those are not the same buildings.
https://www.google.com/search?q=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjP4K_HlK7vAhUOAlMKHa57CgkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoCCAA6BAgAEB46BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeUMr4AVj0lgJgn5sCaABwAHgAgAGRAogB5g6SAQU0LjQuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=jydNYI_dOI6EzAKu96lI&bih=663&biw=1280&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS751US760#imgrc=1_EeHO3xx5TiiM&imgdii=EMjo39STAQksjM
I wanted to say the same thing also, but this angle shows it might be camera manipulation.
I’m w you. If you look at other photos the tree to the left has the exact same branch structure as the one seen photographed w Trump. These posts are all over telegram which is so annoying.
There's a lot of people who have trouble understanding how the camera angles are working against you.
This is a crude sketch but it should definitely explain what you are seeing.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
You won't get through to them.
This place has become overrun by facebook boomer big brains who think everything is a fake movie.