4
username7 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, deport immigrants to Geneva. We need to look outside the coun.. I mean box.

1
username7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, His will, because my will has zero idea what's going on these days.

1
username7 1 point ago +1 / -0

See something, say something.

3
username7 3 points ago +9 / -6

This was 1973. And those aren't panda eyes. I went to church with Alice in the 90s. He's a good guy now. Stop with the over-reaching.

1
username7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are they still a couple?

2
username7 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kabbalists wear white on shabbat

2
username7 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think this was about her upcoming tour - that won't happen now. Pic isn't of a corpse but she was an ardent pusher of the jabs.

1
username7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do we have a detective on-board to fact-check these items? Something super sus about him.

2
username7 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone pls help clarify - these Q posts are from 2017 and 2019. How do they apply to today? thx

3
username7 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now it would be Divine Intervention that would stop the DS from cheating. Heavenly Father, we need you!

1
username7 1 point ago +1 / -0

All of her adopted children are "walnut".

1
username7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Million dollar question: do you think Q is a time traveler? How else could it be prevalent now? Thanks for indulging me.

0
username7 0 points ago +2 / -2

Okay, I still don't understand why a Q post from Oct 4, 2018 is relevant to the time of a recent twitter post. Q isn't a time-traveler. Q's post on Oct 4, 2018 was about the events of Oct 4, 2018 - not now. Are we putting too much into this tactic of Twitter times and Q's post number? Has this tactic proven to be worthwhile? Somebody explain, pls. Thx

view more: Next ›