What is the validity of this claim? Seems like a stretch
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (146)
sorted by:
Sure, we can roll with that. The checks aren't out yet. But surely some guy saying stimulus checks have Trumps signature on them is a pretty big boast, right? So let's explore that, we may find our answer early! You'd think others might be talking about it too but it's not like people race to be first in the news world.
First who is Matt Crouch, well according to his Twitter profile he's "Christian - Father - Investigator - Political Analyst - http://TheDCPatriot.com - Truth Slinger - Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum - IG/Parler/Gab: @RealMattCouch"
That's all well and good but we know he isn't a Washington bigwig but let's go further...
Here is the source tweet the image above references...
https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch/status/1371114897564528640
The tweet itself seems to link an obscure news outlet called thedcpatriot.com as its source for his statement.
Alright so let's so to the source article...
https://thedcpatriot.com/bidens-signature-wont-appear-on-stimulus-checks-but-donald-j-trumps-will-the-white-house-says/
Well, wouldn't you know it? Guess who the author is? It's old mate Matt Crouch!
Or you're getting less and less retarded that you notice how retarded people have always been.
My man!
Kek!
I think the shills have gotten some better scripts.
Lots of Twatter refugees for sure.
There is nothing suspect (by itself) of tweeting out a link to an article on your own website.
That's stating the obvious, did you even look at the article?
I'm exploring what Matt Crouch tweeted, and it turns out Matt Crouch's tweet is backed up by the hard hitting truths of none other than Matt Crouch. Matt Crouch doesn't need sources, or pictures, real quotes, a spell check, or even sensical grammar.
He signs off his articles with a nice shot of himself in a black t-shirt and aviators. Y'know, to bring that sense of professionalism that thedcpatriot provides. He also doesn't fit in the frame. Portly fellow.
Happy to open a sportsbook with anybody who wants to bet on Matt Crouch. I'll pay good odds too.
Your evidence of suspicion still appears to me to be that Matt Crouch is citing himself. Are you suggesting some OTHER reason to be suspicious?
I am not in any way saying I believe Matt Crouch. He doesn't provide source links. I am not a fan of that. He says in his tweet that DJT will sign the new checks, but his article says something else. THIS is evidence of untrustworthyness, but I don't see you saying that anywhere. You only made statements of him citing himself, or bad editing, or other things that I consider to be non-evidence of suspicion. At this point I am more likely to trust sources with bad site editing than those that look professional (though in truth I trust no one).
Regarding my first statement: I responded stating that there is nothing suspect in linking to yourself. I stand by that response.
Reasons to be suspicious
As said, your statement of there is nothing suspect linking yourself is a hollow statement. It doesn't need to be said and I never said there was anything wrong with it. There was never a need for you to stand by it. That's why you dig, to find out if it floats or not.
Although given what I have presented overall I'm eager to learn more about this all not seeming like he suspiciously talks bullshit that you propose. Take your time.
Does Matt's website have links that want to talk about your health? And sell you China-made supplements packaged in the USA?
that is some fine independent research, something this site used to be all about.
DCpatriot is Matt Couch’s website I’m pretty sure. I’m also skeptical until I see it myself but Couch is usually over the target.
He's the one named by the whistleblower to Lin Wood that blocked the information getting to Nunes(?, I think). He wanted to get in the middle and be the one to get accolades but it backfired and the whistleblower wasn't able to complete that.
I had so much research on this that I didn't save :(
From what I can remember, Matt Couch was part of America First Media that was investigating the murder of Seth Rich. There was another group that was ran by Jack Burkman, who the FBI tried to kill https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/conservative-lobbyist-was-attacked-outside-his-arlington-home-tuesday-evening-police-say/2018/01/17/9e9340d6-fba4-11e7-a46b-a3614530bd87_story.html
Basically they had different narratives about what happened to Seth Rich. Matt Couch had all of the info that surrounded Seth Rich's murder. He was able to find out that it was MS-13 gang members working for the FBI, but never got further than that.
Frank Whalen, who worked for America First Media, originally sent the Ryan D. White whistle blower letter to Judicial Watch and Congress (intelligence committee?) I suspect that Matt Couch had the whistleblower information for a long time but never released, instead throwing out bits and pieces of it. He eluded to not being able to release info because he could be sued. I think Whalen got tired of it, left the group, and tried to get the whistleblower in contact with anyone that could do something about it. Lin Wood eventually got the letter, probably from a staffer in Congress that found it or a staffer from Judicial Watch. Finally, Lin Wood interviewed "Ryan D. White" and got all of the information to us.
It seems like alot of people involved in the private investigations into Seth Rich's murder didn't really want to solve the murder. They just wanted to profit from it by turning into this unsolved cold case.