What is the validity of this claim? Seems like a stretch
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (146)
sorted by:
That's stating the obvious, did you even look at the article?
I'm exploring what Matt Crouch tweeted, and it turns out Matt Crouch's tweet is backed up by the hard hitting truths of none other than Matt Crouch. Matt Crouch doesn't need sources, or pictures, real quotes, a spell check, or even sensical grammar.
He signs off his articles with a nice shot of himself in a black t-shirt and aviators. Y'know, to bring that sense of professionalism that thedcpatriot provides. He also doesn't fit in the frame. Portly fellow.
Happy to open a sportsbook with anybody who wants to bet on Matt Crouch. I'll pay good odds too.
Your evidence of suspicion still appears to me to be that Matt Crouch is citing himself. Are you suggesting some OTHER reason to be suspicious?
I am not in any way saying I believe Matt Crouch. He doesn't provide source links. I am not a fan of that. He says in his tweet that DJT will sign the new checks, but his article says something else. THIS is evidence of untrustworthyness, but I don't see you saying that anywhere. You only made statements of him citing himself, or bad editing, or other things that I consider to be non-evidence of suspicion. At this point I am more likely to trust sources with bad site editing than those that look professional (though in truth I trust no one).
Regarding my first statement: I responded stating that there is nothing suspect in linking to yourself. I stand by that response.
Reasons to be suspicious
As said, your statement of there is nothing suspect linking yourself is a hollow statement. It doesn't need to be said and I never said there was anything wrong with it. There was never a need for you to stand by it. That's why you dig, to find out if it floats or not.
Although given what I have presented overall I'm eager to learn more about this all not seeming like he suspiciously talks bullshit that you propose. Take your time.
Well done, thank you kindly.
'Matt Couch' ( you misspelled his name) has no legitimate press credentials'
so who is this 'legitimate press' you speak of?
Indeed, I misspelled his name.
And really, after all that, you think one paltry question somehow throws a spanner in the works? That's it? That's your checkmate?
You might have heard a rumour I'm starting a sportsbook. If you're happy to bet on your lame horse I'm willing to pay you at a rate of 10:1 if he crosses the finish line. No refunds on your highly likely loss - store policy.
Plenty of sources reported on it. The news article was stickied here a few days ago in fact. https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/09/politics/joe-biden-stimulus-payments-signature/index.html
That article only says that Biden’s name won’t be on them.
Matt Couch is making the claim Trump’s name will be.
Those aren’t the same thing.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/09/politics/joe-biden-stimulus-payments-signature/index.html
Does Matt's website have links that want to talk about your health? And sell you China-made supplements packaged in the USA?